Select Player · Episode 3Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Barrett

Episode 3 Rank3of 17

Barrett entered The Crossovers, received access to replacement planning, reported information to Dee, and coordinated vote counts with her. Dee protected him from becoming the replacement nominee. Those responses raised both Referent and Informational Power. Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Reporting and Protection Make Barrett a Useful Crossovers Partner

Barrett entered The Crossovers, received access to replacement planning, reported information to Dee, and coordinated vote counts with her. Dee protected him from becoming the replacement nominee. Those responses raised both Referent and Informational Power.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 3 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 11.

Clearest Response: Dee protected Barrett from replacement consideration and treated him as a close information partner.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No valued benefit has changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Barrett’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerDee protected Barrett from replacement consideration and treated him as a close information partner.The relationship produced real protection. Its clearest reach was through Dee and The Crossovers, not the whole house.
Informational PowerBarrett repeatedly reported game information to Dee and helped count votes.Dee used him inside active planning, showing that his information affected coordination.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Barrett ↔ Dee strengthened through reporting, vote coordination, and protection.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

Barrett joined The Crossovers with high but mixed commitment because he was recruited after the core decision. The alliance was active but not yet tested at eviction.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 3

Barrett’s Total Power Score Rises by 2 Because Dee Uses His Reports and Protects Him from Replacement Danger

Total Power Score: 9 → 11

Why: Barrett entered The Crossovers, received access to replacement planning, reported information to Dee, and coordinated vote counts with her. Dee protected him from becoming the replacement nominee. Those responses raised both Referent and Informational Power.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, and Expert Power 2.

Why It Matters: Barrett’s strongest influence came from being useful to the HOH and included in an active alliance. The relationship provided access and protection, but his late recruitment left some uncertainty about his standing inside the group.

05

Position Analysis

Reporting and Protection Make Barrett a Useful Crossovers Partner

Barrett’s strongest influence came from being useful to the HOH and included in an active alliance. The relationship provided access and protection, but his late recruitment left some uncertainty about his standing inside the group.

Bottom Line: Barrett’s practical power was relational and informational (Referent 3, Informational 3). The next test is whether The Crossovers follows a plan he helps shape rather than only using the reports he supplies.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Barrett was neither nominated nor protected by a Safety Lock. His access came from Dee and The Crossovers rather than a formal role.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Barrett could demonstrate at this cutoff. Referent Power and Informational Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

What happens when Barrett disagrees with The Crossovers instead of supplying information?

Why It Matters: That response would reveal whether he has decision-shaping influence or mainly a useful reporting role.