Select Player · Episode 3LaTrice⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3
LaTrice
LaTrice and Taylor repeatedly coordinated targets and replacement ideas, agreed on a shared timing strategy, and appeared inside Rome’s trusted circle. Those voluntary responses raised Referent Power. Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.
LaTrice
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Repeated Coordination With Taylor Raises LaTrice’s Referent Power
LaTrice and Taylor repeatedly coordinated targets and replacement ideas, agreed on a shared timing strategy, and appeared inside Rome’s trusted circle. Those voluntary responses raised Referent Power.
Current Position: Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.
Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 9 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 10.
Clearest Response: Taylor repeatedly coordinated strategy with LaTrice, and Rome named LaTrice inside his inner circle.
What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting LaTrice’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Referent Power | Taylor repeatedly coordinated strategy with LaTrice, and Rome named LaTrice inside his inner circle. | The relationships produced trust and shared planning. They had not yet been tested by a final vote. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationships
LaTrice ↔ Taylor strengthened through repeated coordination and commitment. Rome also treated LaTrice as part of an inner circle.
Most Significant Alliances and Groups
No named alliance at this cutoff fully represented LaTrice’s strongest ties.
04
Power Shifts
Episode 3
LaTrice’s Total Power Score Rises by 1 Because Taylor Repeatedly Coordinates Strategy with Her and Rome Includes Her in His Inner Circle
Total Power Score: 9 → 10
Why: LaTrice and Taylor repeatedly coordinated targets and replacement ideas, agreed on a shared timing strategy, and appeared inside Rome’s trusted circle. Those voluntary responses raised Referent Power.
What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Informational Power 2.
Why It Matters: LaTrice had a clear strategic partner in Taylor and a wider connection through Rome. The next step was converting those ties into delivered protection under nomination pressure.
05
Position Analysis
Repeated Coordination With Taylor Raises LaTrice’s Referent Power
LaTrice had a clear strategic partner in Taylor and a wider connection through Rome. The next step was converting those ties into delivered protection under nomination pressure.
Bottom Line: LaTrice’s strongest current source of power was relationship power (Referent 3). The next test is whether she and Taylor secure the same replacement and vote plan.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
LaTrice was not nominated and held no Safety Lock or office. Her score change came from voluntary coordination.
Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.
07
Best Move Right Now
There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.
08
What the Rating Means
The Episode 3 score brings together the influence LaTrice could demonstrate at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.
09
Public Opinion
No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.
Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.
10
What to Watch For Next
How do LaTrice and Taylor respond if one of their preferred replacement plans fails?
Why It Matters: Their response would show whether the relationship can survive disagreement and still coordinate.