Select Player · Episode 3Angela

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Angela

Episode 3 Rank9of 17

Dee sought Angela’s Big Brother guidance, Mallory described Angela as emotional protection, Jason formed a personal connection with her, and Angela coordinated with Devens inside The Crossovers. Those responses raised her Referent Power while her Expert evidence remained limited. Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Angela
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Angela

Power Rating By Episode

10Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Trusted Connections Raise Angela’s Referent Power

Dee sought Angela’s Big Brother guidance, Mallory described Angela as emotional protection, Jason formed a personal connection with her, and Angela coordinated with Devens inside The Crossovers. Those responses raised her Referent Power while her Expert evidence remained limited.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 9 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 10.

Clearest Response: Mallory relied on Angela emotionally, Jason formed a personal connection with her, and Devens coordinated alliance strategy with her.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Angela’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No valued benefit has changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Angela’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Ordinary information access exists without repeated decision-changing use.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerMallory relied on Angela emotionally, Jason formed a personal connection with her, and Devens coordinated alliance strategy with her.Several people treated Angela as a trusted connection. The evidence supported voluntary loyalty and coordination, but not whole-house protection.
Expert PowerDee sought Angela’s guidance because of her prior Big Brother experience and accepted the coaching.The response made Angela’s judgment useful to Dee. One competence-based relationship was not enough for Expert Power 3.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Angela’s relationships with Mallory, Jason, Dee, and Devens strengthened in different ways: emotional reliance, personal identification, accepted guidance, and alliance coordination.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

The Crossovers was confirmed with Angela, Dee, Devens, Drew, and Barrett. Coordination was active, but eviction-level effectiveness had not yet been tested.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 3

Angela’s Total Power Score Rises by 1 Because Several Players Treat Her as a Trusted Connection

Total Power Score: 9 → 10

Why: Dee sought Angela’s Big Brother guidance, Mallory described Angela as emotional protection, Jason formed a personal connection with her, and Angela coordinated with Devens inside The Crossovers. Those responses raised her Referent Power while her Expert evidence remained limited.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: Angela’s influence worked through trusted one-to-one relationships and The Crossovers. Dee’s accepted coaching gave her a possible Expert pathway, but the evidence had not repeated across multiple decisions.

05

Position Analysis

Trusted Connections Raise Angela’s Referent Power

Angela’s influence worked through trusted one-to-one relationships and The Crossovers. Dee’s accepted coaching gave her a possible Expert pathway, but the evidence had not repeated across multiple decisions.

Bottom Line: Angela’s strongest available power was relationship-based (Referent 3), with limited competence evidence still below the next threshold (Expert 2). The next test is whether another player follows her judgment in a consequential decision.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Angela was safe from immediate nominee pressure and had no competition-based Safety Lock. Her position came from relationships and alliance access rather than a current office.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Angela could demonstrate at this cutoff. Referent Power and Expert Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Who follows Angela’s advice when the replacement nominee is chosen?

Why It Matters: A consequential response would show whether her accepted guidance develops into stronger Expert Power.