Select Player · Episode 3Rome

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Rome

Episode 3 Rank3of 17

Rome remained Lyric’s number-one ally, gained a working agreement with Chuk, promised loyalty to Devens, and named Jason and LaTrice inside his inner circle. He also offered competition assistance, supporting Reward and Referent Power. Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Rome
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Rome

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

A Broad Trust Network Raises Rome’s Reward and Referent Power

Rome remained Lyric’s number-one ally, gained a working agreement with Chuk, promised loyalty to Devens, and named Jason and LaTrice inside his inner circle. He also offered competition assistance, supporting Reward and Referent Power.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 3 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 11.

Clearest Response: Lyric treated Rome as her closest ally; Chuk agreed to work with him; Rome also connected with Devens, Jason, and LaTrice.

What Changed: Reward Power 1 → 2; Referent Power 2 → 3.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Rome’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection offer has produced a response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Rome’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Ordinary information access exists without repeated decision-changing use.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerLyric treated Rome as her closest ally; Chuk agreed to work with him; Rome also connected with Devens, Jason, and LaTrice.The network was broad and voluntary. It had not yet been tested by an eviction vote.
Reward PowerRome offered competition assistance and support inside his relationships.The benefit created limited reciprocal value. No repeated delivered resource supported a higher rating.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Rome strengthened with Lyric, Chuk, Devens, Jason, and LaTrice.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

No single named alliance at this cutoff captured Rome’s wider relationship network.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 3

Rome’s Total Power Score Rises by 2 Because Multiple Trusted Ties and Limited Assistance Create a Broad Working Network

Total Power Score: 9 → 11

Why: Rome remained Lyric’s number-one ally, gained a working agreement with Chuk, promised loyalty to Devens, and named Jason and LaTrice inside his inner circle. He also offered competition assistance, supporting Reward and Referent Power.

What Changed: Reward Power 1 → 2; Referent Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: Rome had one of the broadest early relationship networks and remained safe. The next question was whether those different ties would agree when a replacement nominee and vote forced tradeoffs.

05

Position Analysis

A Broad Trust Network Raises Rome’s Reward and Referent Power

Rome had one of the broadest early relationship networks and remained safe. The next question was whether those different ties would agree when a replacement nominee and vote forced tradeoffs.

Bottom Line: Rome combined a limited ability to help others with several trusted ties (Reward 2, Referent 3). The next test is whether his network acts together or pulls him in conflicting directions.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Rome retained a premiere Safety Lock. The lock protected him, while the relationship and assistance evidence separately supported his ratings.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Rome could demonstrate at this cutoff. Referent Power and Reward Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Which relationship does Rome prioritize when the replacement nomination divides the house?

Why It Matters: The choice would reveal where his Referent Power is strongest and which ties are mainly social.