Spoilers · Contains Big Brother 28, Episode 18 results

Power Analysis Episode 18

Kamu Keeps the Nominations the Same as New Alliances Take Shape

Kamu wins the veto and leaves Haley, Chuk, and Barrett on the block while disclosures damage old ties and FAP forms as an untested new group.

01

Episode at a Glance

What Happened Since the Last Episode

Angela admitted to Haley that she had voted against Lyric. Haley told Chuk, both withdrew trust from Angela, and the argument pushed Angela back toward LaTrice’s HOH group. Dee separately told Kamu about her vote and the unused BB Bribe; Kamu updated his view and discussed a new overlap.

Kamu joined LaTrice, Haley, Chuk, Barrett, and Dee in the veto competition and won. He coordinated a plan to leave the nominations unchanged, partly to protect possible replacement nominees and partly to separate from Haley and Chuk. Haley and Chuk could not reverse that decision.

Kamu did not use the veto, leaving Haley, Chuk, and Barrett as the final nominees. Mallory, Melody, Drew, and Barrett named FAP, but the group had not yet completed a consequential action together. The fifth Time Capsule vote opened, with no recipient or result known at the cutoff.

02

Power

Kamu’s Veto Gives the HOH Side a Benefit Without Raising Any Score

These are the clearest and most consequential examples of power used in Episode 18, not every observed or attempted use. Visit the individual player pages for more information.

PowerClearest Use and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It StoppedRating Effect
Legitimate PowerKamu won the veto and briefly gained the recognized right to change the nominations.That right mattered during the live veto window and expired when he declined to use it.No lasting rating change.
Reward PowerKamu’s non-use protected possible replacement nominees and received approval from the HOH-side overlap.The group received a real benefit, but one cycle did not establish repeated Reward3 leverage.Kamu remained at 2 with upward evidence.
Coercive PowerLaTrice’s original nominations remained in force after the veto was not used.Her HOH-backed consequences continued through the cycle, while Kamu imposed no new consequence.LaTrice remained at 4.
Expert PowerKamu won the veto and made a strategically useful choice for several partners.The win and decision did not by themselves show a repeated pattern of players accepting Kamu’s strategic judgment.Rating stayed the same.
Referent PowerKamu withheld protection from Haley and Chuk while FAP formed around Mallory, Melody, Drew, and Barrett.The relationships changed, but the evidence was dyadic or newly untested rather than broad enough for a new rating.No overall rating changed.
Informational PowerAngela and Dee disclosed concealed vote information that changed Haley, Chuk, and Kamu’s responses.Angela’s disclosure damaged two relationships; Dee’s selective disclosure supported existing strong reach.Rating stayed the same.

Legitimate Power

Kamu won the veto and briefly gained the recognized right to change the nominations. That right mattered during the live veto window and expired when he declined to use it. Rating Effect: No lasting rating change.

Reward Power

Kamu’s non-use protected possible replacement nominees and received approval from the HOH-side overlap. The group received a real benefit, but one cycle did not establish repeated Reward3 leverage. Rating Effect: Kamu remained at 2 with upward evidence.

Coercive Power

LaTrice’s original nominations remained in force after the veto was not used. Her HOH-backed consequences continued through the cycle, while Kamu imposed no new consequence. Rating Effect: LaTrice remained at 4.

Expert Power

Kamu won the veto and made a strategically useful choice for several partners. The win and decision did not by themselves show a repeated pattern of players accepting Kamu’s strategic judgment. Rating Effect: Rating stayed the same.

Referent Power

Kamu withheld protection from Haley and Chuk while FAP formed around Mallory, Melody, Drew, and Barrett. The relationships changed, but the evidence was dyadic or newly untested rather than broad enough for a new rating. Rating Effect: No overall rating changed.

Informational Power

Angela and Dee disclosed concealed vote information that changed Haley, Chuk, and Kamu’s responses. Angela’s disclosure damaged two relationships; Dee’s selective disclosure supported existing strong reach. Rating Effect: Rating stayed the same.

Current Power Leaderboard

LaTrice Leads While Every Rating Holds

The Total Power Score is the sum of six current ratings, each scored from 1 to 4. Because more than ten players remain, this display shows the top five and bottom five active entries. The bottom five do not receive individual explanations here. Standard competition ranks are used; roster order determines which tied entries appear when a tie crosses a display cutoff.

GroupRankPlayerTotal Power Score
Top1LaTrice16
Top2Devens15
Top3Dee14
Top4Angela12
Top4Barrett12
Bottom8Mallory11
Bottom10Melody10
Bottom10Yash10
Bottom12Chuk9
Bottom13Haley7

Players omitted at a tied cutoff are not ranked below displayed players with the same score.

LaTrice · Rank 1

LaTrice kept her nominations intact after Kamu’s non-use, preserving the formal consequences of her HOH decision. The Episode 18 leaderboard records LaTrice at 16.

Devens · Rank 2

Devens remained protected by the HOH-side overlap while his concealed Diamond Veto stayed unused. The Episode 18 leaderboard records Devens at 15.

Dee · Rank 3

Dee’s selective disclosure changed Kamu’s trust and coalition planning, supporting her existing information reach. The Episode 18 leaderboard records Dee at 14.

Angela · Rank 4

Angela’s truth changed Haley and Chuk’s understanding but damaged both relationships, while the HOH side gave Angela support. The Episode 18 leaderboard records Angela at 12.

Barrett · Rank 4

Barrett remained a final nominee as his Jugglers bond and new FAP commitment awaited a real protection test. The Episode 18 leaderboard records Barrett at 12.

Episode 18 Power Shifts

No individual power rating changed in this episode. The changing situation is recorded without inventing score movement.

03

Relationships

Specific Relationships and Alliance Structures Mattered in Different Ways

Most Consequential: Kamu ↔ Yash, Drew, and Devens. Kamu won the veto and gave the HOH-side overlap a valued benefit by leaving the nominations unchanged.

Most Significant Alliances and Voting Groups

FAP · Newly named and untested

Mallory, Melody, Drew, and Barrett expressed alignment, but naming the group did not prove future protection or control.

HOH-side overlap · Coordinated the veto non-use

LaTrice, Taylor, Angela, Dee, Devens, and Kamu shared enough interests to preserve the nominations without forming one complete alliance.

Haley and Chuk · Loyal but unprotected

Their bond remained strong, while Kamu’s non-use showed that the wider network would not protect them in this decision.

04

Strategy & Luck

Performance, Safety, Structure, and Chance

The veto draw combined guaranteed nominee and HOH access, Chuk’s Houseguest Choice selection of Kamu, and a random draw for Dee. Kamu’s win created temporary veto authority and safety, both of which ended when he declined to use it. The Time Capsule vote, Devens’s Diamond Veto, and Dee’s disclosed BB Bribe remained separate production or resource states.

05

Analysis

Why Kamu Left the Nominations Unchanged

Kamu’s non-use had several causes. He gained a temporary right to decide the veto, wanted distance from Haley and Chuk, faced replacement risks to people he wanted to protect, and received approval from LaTrice, Taylor, Yash, and others. The decision provided a real benefit to the HOH-side overlap, but one benefit in one cycle did not establish repeated Reward Power. Haley and Chuk’s failed appeals also showed where their protection stopped.

Bottom Line: No single move or player created this position. Player choices, relationships, game rules, competition results, and chance all helped shape it.

06

Best Moves

The Clearest Next Actions Build on Demonstrated Responses

  • LaTrice: Keep the target and vote explanation consistent and stop the conflict from becoming personal. The planned voters remain aligned without another relationship breaking over the HOH’s conduct.
  • Devens: Use Devens ↔ Dee and Kamu to ask for one specific vote, warning, or protection commitment. A named player follows through when the next decision becomes real.
  • Dee: Use Dee ↔ Devens and The Veterans to ask for one specific vote, warning, or protection commitment. A named player follows through when the next decision becomes real.

07

Meaning

Demonstrated Influence Matters Only When It Produces a Response

Episode 18 shows why RPM looks past a result. Kamu’s veto changed his options for one ceremony, but a lasting power change still required other players to respond to him in a repeated way. The next decision can change the leaderboard.

08

Predictions

Things to Watch After the Cutoff

  • Who wins the BB Blockbuster? Why It Matters: The winner will determine whether the planned vote matchup ever becomes available.
  • Can Haley or Chuk build verified votes outside their pair? Why It Matters: Their survival paths require protection from players who have not yet delivered it.
  • Does FAP act together when the vote becomes real? Why It Matters: A shared consequential choice would distinguish a working alliance from a new name.