Select Player · Episode 3Devens

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Devens

Episode 3 Rank3of 17

Devens joined both The Crossovers and Red Corner, disclosed Red Corner to selected allies, coordinated with Angela, and gave Rome strategic advice. Those responses raised Referent and Informational Power, although Lyric and Taylor remained negative relationship limits. Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Devens
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Devens

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Alliance Disclosure and Coordination Raise Devens’s Power

Devens joined both The Crossovers and Red Corner, disclosed Red Corner to selected allies, coordinated with Angela, and gave Rome strategic advice. Those responses raised Referent and Informational Power, although Lyric and Taylor remained negative relationship limits.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 3 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 11.

Clearest Response: Devens disclosed Red Corner and used the information in Crossovers coordination. Angela and others adjusted their understanding of the house.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Devens’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No valued benefit has changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

No repeated pattern of players following Devens’ judgment was established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Informational PowerDevens disclosed Red Corner and used the information in Crossovers coordination. Angela and others adjusted their understanding of the house.The disclosure made him a broker between structures. Dee also saw blowback risk, showing that information could carry a trust cost.
Referent PowerAngela coordinated alliance strategy with Devens, and Rome said he was with him.Those voluntary responses supported meaningful ties. Lyric’s refusal to trust him and Taylor’s earlier reaction limited his reach.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Devens strengthened with Angela and Rome but remained weak with Lyric and Taylor. Dee also worried about the cost of his Red Corner disclosure.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

Devens held high commitment in The Crossovers and low, deceptive commitment in Red Corner. His position depended on keeping the two structures from comparing notes.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 3

Devens’s Total Power Score Rises by 2 Because Allies Use His Alliance Information and Coordinate with Him

Total Power Score: 9 → 11

Why: Devens joined both The Crossovers and Red Corner, disclosed Red Corner to selected allies, coordinated with Angela, and gave Rome strategic advice. Those responses raised Referent and Informational Power, although Lyric and Taylor remained negative relationship limits.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, and Expert Power 2.

Why It Matters: Devens gained influence by connecting alliance structures and giving useful advice. The same visibility created risk because some players distrusted him and Dee recognized possible blowback.

05

Position Analysis

Alliance Disclosure and Coordination Raise Devens’s Power

Devens gained influence by connecting alliance structures and giving useful advice. The same visibility created risk because some players distrusted him and Dee recognized possible blowback.

Bottom Line: Devens’s usable power was relational and informational (Referent 3, Informational 3), while Expert Power remained 2 because other players had not repeatedly followed Devens’s judgment. The next test is whether his allies keep trusting him after the hidden alliance information spreads.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens had no current formal office and was a Have-Not. His ratings came from relationships and information, not from safety or comfort.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Devens could demonstrate at this cutoff. Informational Power and Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Who still trusts Devens if Red Corner learns how he described it?

Why It Matters: The answer would show whether his Informational Power survives the relationship cost of information-sharing role.