Select Player · Episode 22Devens⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 22
Devens
Devens’s exposure and jury threats created visible concern and helped hold the vote, supporting Coercive Power already at 4. Devens held Rank 1 of 11 and a Total Power Score of 19.
Devens
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Devens’s Position After Episode 22
One event best captured Devens’s position at the cutoff: Devens’s exposure and jury threats created visible concern and helped hold the vote, supporting Coercive Power already at 4.
Episode 22 began after Devens used the Diamond Veto and placed Kamu beside Angela and Haley. Kamu and Yash campaigned against the veteran voting group, while Mallory and Melody questioned Mosh Pit and seriously considered keeping Kamu. Haley separately identified the Dee–Devens–Barrett–Drew grouping, and Taylor and Yash used that information.
Current Position: Rank 1 of 11 with a Total Power Score of 19.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 1 → Rank 1; Total Power Score 19 → 19.
Clearest Response: Devens’s exposure and jury threats created visible concern and helped hold the vote, supporting Coercive Power already at 4.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Devens’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Coercive Power | Devens’s exposure and jury threats created visible concern and helped hold the vote, supporting Coercive Power already at 4. | The named response supports the current rating. Its reach stops where another player chose differently or no additional response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Devens ↔ Dee and the pressured vote bloc was the most important relationship path at this cutoff. | The bond mattered only to choices it actually changed; the relationship or alliance name did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Devens ↔ Dee and the pressured vote bloc · Relationship to Watch
Devens’s connection with Dee and the pressured vote bloc remained worth watching at the Episode 22 cutoff. A vote, warning, or protection decision after Episode 22 will show how much weight it carries for Devens.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
Crossovers decision core · Powerful but increasingly fractured
For Devens in Episode 22, the three shared information and planning access, while protections involving Drew and Barrett stopped converting at key decisions.
04
Power Shifts
Devens’s Power Ratings Hold at 19 Through the Blockbuster and Eviction
Total Power Score: 19 → 19
Why: Devens’s exposure and jury threats created visible concern and helped hold the vote, supporting Coercive Power already at 4.
What Changed: No individual power rating changed.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 2, Reward Power 3, Coercive Power 4, Expert Power 3, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 4.
Why It Matters: Danger or opportunity can change without changing power. For Devens in Episode 22, the score stayed at 19.
05
Position Analysis
Where Devens Stands After Episode 22
Devens’s position rested most heavily on Coercive Power and Informational Power. The episode record shows those strengths at work: Devens’s exposure and jury threats created visible concern and helped hold the vote, supporting Coercive Power already at 4.
Bottom Line: Devens still had these forms of influence available (Legitimate 2, Reward 3, Coercive 4, Expert 3, Referent 3, and Informational 4). That gives Devens a usable position without guaranteeing the same response elsewhere. The next test is whether that relationship remains useful for Devens after the vote exposes the house lines.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Angela’s Blockbuster win created temporary safety and changed the final matchup without raising a power rating. Kamu lost the direct safety route and became the final player. Yash’s HOH authority and Safety Lock expired after the vote. Dee’s unused BB Bribe remained a resource, and Time Capsule Round 6 was still open at the cutoff.
The Episode 22 results changed the board around Devens, not the power evidence. Devens stayed at 19 because no new response pattern was established by the Episode 22 cutoff.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Use the relationship with Dee and the pressured vote bloc to secure one clear commitment for the next cycle.
What Would Show It Worked: The promised vote, warning, or protection arrives when Devens needs it.
08
What the Rating Means
The clearest influence in Devens’s Episode 22 score came from Coercive Power and Informational Power. Devens demonstrated it through consequences Devens could credibly impose and information that changed plans or understanding.
09
Public Opinion
Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week
Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.
| Poll Week | Fan Rank | Vote Share | RPM Rank at This Cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 of 17 | 18% | 1 of 11 |
| 2 | 1 of 16 | 26% | 1 of 11 |
| 3 | 1 of 16 | 20% | 1 of 11 |
| 4 | 1 of 17 | 21% | 1 of 11 |
| 5 | 1 of 17 | 20% | 1 of 11 |
Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll results recorded in the current local dataset. The poll reflects participating fans; RPM follows demonstrated influence inside the house.
Official Audience Action: Devens received the Diamond Veto through the Time Capsule and used it in Episode 21 to save Dee and nominate Kamu.
A Question Worth Following
Are fans and RPM seeing the same strength in Devens’s game after Episode 22? At the Episode 22 cutoff, Devens is Rank 1 in RPM and Rank 1 in the latest available fan poll. After Episode 22, the two rankings view Devens from different places—one from the audience and one from demonstrated influence in the game. Devens’s Episode 22 match or difference is worth following as later evidence arrives.
10
What to Watch For Next
Does Devens turn the strongest current relationship into protection?
Why It Matters: A vote or warning from this relationship would show whether Devens can turn trust into action.