Select Player · Episode 6Devens

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6

Devens

Episode 6 Rank1of 16

Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan. Rank 1 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 20.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Devens
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Devens

Power Rating By Episode

20Episode 6 Score
6121824E1E5E6
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–C for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Devens Wins HOH and Veto

Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan. The episode also changed the house around Devens: After Ashley left, the house reset with sixteen players and no active HOH or Safety Locks. Devens won HOH, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and then won the veto. Rome was discussed as the replacement target, but the ceremony had not happened at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 1 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 20.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 3 → Rank 1; Total Power Score 12 → 20.

Clearest Response: Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Devens’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power4

Formal HOH authority supplies broad current decision rights.

Reward Power3

Repeated credible benefits influence several decisions or relationships.

Coercive Power4

Current HOH authority supports broad nomination or replacement consequences.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but repeated deference is not established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power4

Information repeatedly shapes understanding and decisions across groups.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Legitimate Power and Reward Power and Coercive Power and Informational PowerDevens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan.The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationDevens → Yash, Mallory, and Lyric was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Devens → Yash, Mallory, and Lyric · Current test

Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Toolshed · Confirmed and coordinating

The group coordinated the Rome plan, while mixed personal commitment limited claims about long-term loyalty.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 6

Devens’s Total Power Score Rises by 8 Because Devens Wins HOH and Veto

Total Power Score: 12 → 20

Why: Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan.

What Changed: Legitimate Power 1 → 4; Reward Power 2 → 3; Coercive Power 1 → 4; Informational Power 3 → 4.

What Stayed the Same: Expert Power 2, and Referent Power 3.

Why It Matters: The changed ratings identify which mechanism gained or lost demonstrated reach. The result still includes other players’ choices, structure, and chance.

05

Position Analysis

The Current Power Mix Defines the Position

Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Legitimate Power and Coercive Power and Informational Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Devens alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.

Bottom Line: Devens could still use several forms of influence (Legitimate 4, Reward 3, Coercive 4, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 4). Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan. The next test is whether Devens → Yash, Mallory, and Lyric produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and formal decision rights. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were production-designed conditions. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.

For Devens, the player-specific evidence is clear: Devens won HOH and veto, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and used safety promises and selective information to shape the Rome plan. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Use the veto only after securing one clear promise about the Rome vote.

What Would Show It Worked: Lyric or another beneficiary states a commitment and later follows it.

08

What the Rating Means

The score shows the kinds of influence Devens could still use at this cutoff. Legitimate Power and Coercive Power and Informational Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.

10

What to Watch For Next

Who will make the next concrete game choice that protects Devens?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Devens’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.