Select Player · Episode 6Rome

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6

Rome

Episode 6 Rank15of 16

Rome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust. That placed Rome at Rank 15 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 9.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Rome
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Rome

Power Rating By Episode

9Episode 6 Score
6121824E1E5E6
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–C for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Rome Loses Control of Target Information

The episode gave Rome a clear role in the week: Rome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust.

After Ashley left, the house reset with sixteen players and no active HOH or Safety Locks. Devens won HOH, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and then won the veto. Rome was discussed as the replacement target, but the ceremony had not happened at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 15 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 9.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 10 → Rank 15; Total Power Score 10 → 9.

Clearest Response: Rome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Rome’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power1

No offer or protection promise clearly changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power1

Information is not producing useful responses and may be creating exposure.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Informational PowerRome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust.That response supports the rating. The episode did not show the same influence reaching beyond the people named here.
Relationships and InformationRome ↔ Melody and LaTrice was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The relationship mattered because it changed a real choice. The alliance name alone did not prove wider influence.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Rome ↔ Melody and LaTrice · Relationship to Watch

The connection with Melody and LaTrice became Rome’s clearest relationship test in Episode 6. The response made the connection visible: Rome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust. For Rome, the effect did not reach beyond Melody and LaTrice and the choice named here.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Mama’s Angels · Confirmed but strained

For Rome, the trio remained connected, while strain around Rome limited cohesion and broad protection.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 6

Rome’s Total Power Score Falls by 1 Because Rome Loses Control of Target Information

Total Power Score: 10 → 9

Why: Rome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust.

What Changed: Informational Power 2 → 1.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Referent Power 3.

Why It Matters: Rome entered the next decision with less demonstrated reach. The score fell from 10 to 9.

05

Position Analysis

Where Rome Stands After Episode 6

Referent Power remained the strongest part of Rome’s profile. That reading fits the Episode 6 evidence: Rome’s exposed relationships and failed target management reduced his Informational Power while his closest bonds still provided concentrated trust.

Bottom Line: Rome could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2 and Referent 3). The episode confirmed where Rome’s influence worked without proving wider control. The next useful evidence should come from Melody and LaTrice: a vote, protection, nomination change, or useful warning.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and official decision-making power. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were conditions created by the game. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Repair one damaged relationship at a time and ask that player to challenge the house target directly.

What Would Show It Worked: Melody, LaTrice, or another voter changes a promised action rather than only listening.

08

What the Rating Means

Referent Power was the strongest part of Rome’s Episode 6 score. In Rome’s game, the evidence came from relationships that produced trust or protection.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.

10

What to Watch For Next

Can Rome turn the named relationship into a vote, protection, or useful warning?

Why It Matters: A concrete choice from Melody and LaTrice would show whether Rome’s relationships can still change the game.