Select Player · Episode 6Drew

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6

Drew

Episode 6 Rank4of 16

Drew offered strategic advice, and the week’s HOH listened. Devens credited Drew’s logic while the Toolshed planned to backdoor Rome. Drew also kept information moving through the Crossovers, leaving him ranked 4 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Drew
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Drew

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 6 Score
6121824E1E5E6
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Drew’s Position After Episode 6

Drew had no official role, but his advice reached the person who did. Devens credited Drew’s strategic logic as the Toolshed settled on Rome as the backdoor target. At the same time, Drew continued sharing information through the Toolshed and Crossovers. Devens had won both HOH and veto, yet the ceremony had not happened by the cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 4 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 3 → Rank 4; Total Power Score 12 → 12.

Clearest Response: Devens credited Drew’s strategic logic while considering the plan for Rome.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Drew’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power1

No offer or protection promise clearly changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power4

Information repeatedly shapes understanding and decisions across groups.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Informational PowerDrew shared strategy and information through the Toolshed and Crossovers. Devens credited his logic while considering the Rome plan.Drew’s ideas reached the HOH, but the episode did not show several other players changing course because of his advice.
Relationships and InformationDrew’s connection with Devens was the clearest path for his influence at this cutoff.The relationship gave Drew access to the week’s decision-maker. It did not give him the final say over the veto.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Drew → Devens · Relationship to Watch

Drew supplied strategy, and Devens openly credited it. That response gave the relationship practical value because Devens controlled the veto decision. Drew could shape the conversation, but Devens still chose what happened next.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Toolshed · Confirmed and coordinating

The group coordinated the Rome plan, while mixed personal commitment limited claims about long-term loyalty.

04

Power Shifts

Drew’s Total Power Score Holds at 12

Total Power Score: 12 → 12

Why: Devens accepted Drew’s strategic input, and Drew kept information moving through two groups. One episode did not show enough new reach to raise a rating.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 4.

Why It Matters: Drew influenced the HOH’s thinking without gaining control of the decision. His score stayed at 12.

05

Position Analysis

Where Drew Stands After Episode 6

Informational Power remained Drew’s strongest rating. He moved between the Toolshed and Crossovers, then offered advice that Devens credited. The evidence showed useful access to one major decision-maker, not a wider pattern of players following Drew’s lead.

Bottom Line: Drew could still use several forms of influence at once (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 4). His information reached Devens and helped shape the Rome discussion, but Devens retained the final decision. The veto ceremony would show whether Drew’s advice became action.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and official decision-making power. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were conditions created by the game. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Devens for one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: Devens follows through by changing a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

08

What the Rating Means

Informational Power led Drew’s Episode 6 profile. His advice reached Devens, and his two alliance channels kept him connected to the week’s planning.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.

10

What to Watch For Next

Will Devens Follow Drew’s Advice at the Veto Ceremony?

Why It Matters: Using the veto as Drew recommended would turn an accepted idea into a visible game result.