Select Player · Episode 6Taylor

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6

Taylor

Episode 6 Rank9of 16

Taylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access. Taylor held Rank 9 of 16 and a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Taylor
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Taylor

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 6 Score
6121824E1E5E6
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Taylor’s Position After Episode 6

One event best captured Taylor’s position at the cutoff: Taylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access.

After Ashley left, the house reset with sixteen players and no active HOH or Safety Locks. Devens won HOH, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and then won the veto. Rome was discussed as the replacement target, but the ceremony had not happened at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 9 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 7 → Rank 9; Total Power Score 11 → 11.

Clearest Response: Taylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Taylor’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power1

No offer or protection promise clearly changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerTaylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access.That response supports the rating. The episode did not show the same influence reaching beyond the people named here.
Relationships and InformationTaylor ↔ Her Existing Network was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The relationship mattered because it changed a real choice. The alliance name alone did not prove wider influence.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Taylor ↔ Her Existing Network · Relationship to Watch

Episode 6 put Taylor’s connection with Her Existing Network under direct pressure. The practical evidence came from a response, not the relationship label: Taylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access. This evidence stops with Taylor, Her Existing Network, and this decision.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Relationships Remain, but No Group Acts Together

For Taylor, taylor still had relationships to work with, but Episode 6 did not show a new alliance changing a major choice.

04

Power Shifts

Taylor’s Total Power Score Holds at 11

Total Power Score: 11 → 11

Why: Taylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: Danger or opportunity can change without changing power. For Taylor, the score stayed at 11.

05

Position Analysis

Where Taylor Stands After Episode 6

Taylor’s position rested most heavily on Referent Power and Informational Power. The episode record shows those strengths at work: Taylor stayed outside immediate danger and retained established relationship and information access.

Bottom Line: Taylor could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). That gives Taylor a usable position without guaranteeing the same response elsewhere. Her Existing Network now has the clearest chance to turn that relationship into protection or another game response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and official decision-making power. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were conditions created by the game. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Her Existing Network for one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: Her Existing Network follows through by changing a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

08

What the Rating Means

The clearest influence in Taylor’s Episode 6 score came from Referent Power and Informational Power. Taylor demonstrated it through relationships that produced trust or protection and information that changed plans or understanding.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.

10

What to Watch For Next

Will someone in Taylor’s current group make the next choice that protects Taylor?

Why It Matters: The answer matters because Her Existing Network can turn the relationship into protection—or show where it stops.