Select Player · Episode 10Taylor⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 10
Taylor
Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.
Taylor
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Taylor Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes
Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. The episode also changed the house around Taylor: Jason correctly recognized the backdoor plan and asked for a path into the veto competition. LaTrice selected him through Houseguest Choice, giving him access. Lyric won the veto, so Jason remained exposed as Kamu’s intended replacement target.
Current Position: Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 10 → Rank 10; Total Power Score 11 → 11.
Clearest Response: Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Taylor’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Referent Power | Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. | The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Taylor → Mallory was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff. | The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Taylor → Mallory · Current test
Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
Honor Society · Confirmed but secrecy compromised
The group remained named, but Angela’s allegiance elsewhere weakened secrecy and commitment.
04
Power Shifts
Taylor’s Total Power Score Holds at 11 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead
Total Power Score: 11 → 11
Why: Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power.
What Changed: No individual power rating changed.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.
Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Taylor, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.
05
Position Analysis
The Current Power Mix Defines the Position
Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power and Informational Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Taylor alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.
Bottom Line: Taylor could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. The next test is whether Taylor → Mallory produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
LaTrice’s Houseguest Choice gave Jason competition access, but Lyric won the veto. The win gave Lyric a recognized decision right, not automatic safety. Kamu remained safe as HOH with replacement authority. Devens’s Diamond Veto and the open Round 3 audience vote stayed separate from the six power ratings until a player response or use could be demonstrated.
For Taylor, the player-specific evidence is clear: Taylor warned Mallory and provided strategic framing that reinforced her existing Informational Power. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Turn Taylor → Mallory into one clear commitment before the next decision.
What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Taylor.
08
What the Rating Means
The score shows the kinds of influence Taylor could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power and Informational Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.
09
Public Opinion
Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week
Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.
| Poll Week | Fan Rank | Vote Share | RPM Rank at This Cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 of 17 | 1% | 10 of 15 |
Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.
Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.
10
What to Watch For Next
Does Taylor’s most important relationship produce a concrete response?
Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Taylor’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.