Select Player · Episode 10Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 10

Barrett

Episode 10 Rank6of 15

Barrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased. Barrett held Rank 6 of 15 and a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 10 Score
6121824E1E5E10
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Barrett’s Position After Episode 10

One event best captured Barrett’s position at the cutoff: Barrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased.

Jason correctly recognized the backdoor plan and asked for a path into the veto competition. LaTrice selected him through Houseguest Choice, giving him access. Lyric won the veto, so Jason remained exposed as Kamu’s intended replacement target.

Current Position: Rank 6 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 6 → Rank 6; Total Power Score 12 → 12.

Clearest Response: Barrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerBarrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased.That response supports the rating. The episode did not show the same influence reaching beyond the people named here.
Relationships and InformationBarrett ↔ Drew was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The relationship mattered because it changed a real choice. The alliance name alone did not prove wider influence.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Barrett ↔ Drew · Relationship to Watch

Episode 10 put Barrett’s connection with Drew under direct pressure. The practical evidence came from a response, not the relationship label: Barrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased. This evidence stops with Barrett, Drew, and this decision.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

The Jugglers · Confirmed strong Final 2

For Barrett, the pair supplied mutual protection and coordination. By Episode 10, the pair’s growing visibility limited how safely Barrett could keep playing across groups.

04

Power Shifts

Barrett’s Total Power Score Holds at 12

Total Power Score: 12 → 12

Why: Barrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: Danger or opportunity can change without changing power. For Barrett, the score stayed at 12.

05

Position Analysis

Where Barrett Stands After Episode 10

Barrett’s position rested most heavily on Referent Power and Informational Power. The episode record shows those strengths at work: Barrett kept the Jugglers bond with Drew while warnings about the pair’s visibility increased.

Bottom Line: Barrett could still use several forms of influence (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). That gives Barrett a usable position without guaranteeing the same response elsewhere. Drew now has the clearest chance to turn that relationship into protection or another game response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

LaTrice’s Houseguest Choice gave Jason a spot in the veto competition, but Lyric won. Lyric controlled the veto decision, but she was not safe until she used it. Kamu remained safe as HOH and would choose any replacement nominee. Devens had not used his Diamond Veto, and the Round 3 audience vote was still open.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Drew for one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: Drew follows through by changing a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

08

What the Rating Means

The clearest influence in Barrett’s Episode 10 score came from Referent Power and Informational Power. Barrett demonstrated it through relationships that produced trust or protection and information that changed plans or understanding.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
16 of 175%6 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.

10

What to Watch For Next

What response will show that Barrett’s strongest relationships still work?

Why It Matters: The answer matters because Drew can turn the relationship into protection—or show where it stops.