Select Player · Episode 4Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 4

Barrett

Episode 4 Rank2of 17

Barrett reassured Taylor, remained active in The Crossovers, and joined vote planning. His ability to offer limited protection and assurance raised Reward Power while his relationship and information ratings held. Tied for Rank 2 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 4 Score
6121824E1E4
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Protection Assurances Raise Barrett’s Reward Power

Barrett reassured Taylor, remained active in The Crossovers, and joined vote planning. His ability to offer limited protection and assurance raised Reward Power while his relationship and information ratings held.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 2 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: tied for Rank 3 of 17 → Tied for Rank 2 of 17; Total Power Score 11 → 12.

Clearest Response: Barrett reassured Taylor that people wanted to keep her and remained involved in vote coordination.

What Changed: Reward Power 1 → 2.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power2

A limited protection or benefit produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence changes another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Barrett’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Reward PowerBarrett reassured Taylor that people wanted to keep her and remained involved in vote coordination.The assurance gave Taylor a valued expectation of protection. Its value still depended on the final matchup and delivered votes.
Referent and Informational PowerBarrett remained a trusted Crossovers member and active vote partner.The group used his coordination, but the Blockbuster could still change the available plan.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Barrett → Taylor strengthened through reassurance. Barrett’s working relationship with Dee and The Crossovers remained active.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

The Crossovers was confirmed, active, and functional. Barrett also joined the temporary anti-Ashley/keep-Taylor voting bloc.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 4

Barrett’s Total Power Score Rises by 1 Because His Protection Assurances Become a Valued Benefit

Total Power Score: 11 → 12

Why: Barrett reassured Taylor, remained active in The Crossovers, and joined vote planning. His ability to offer limited protection and assurance raised Reward Power while his relationship and information ratings held.

What Changed: Reward Power 1 → 2.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: Barrett could give reassurance because he was connected to a plausible voting group. The value would be proven only if the relevant voters stayed together after the Blockbuster.

05

Position Analysis

Protection Assurances Raise Barrett’s Reward Power

Barrett could give reassurance because he was connected to a plausible voting group. The value would be proven only if the relevant voters stayed together after the Blockbuster.

Bottom Line: Barrett combined limited protection with trusted information access (Reward 2, Referent 3, Informational 3). The next test is whether the group he helps coordinate delivers the promised result.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Barrett was a safe voter. His influence depended on coalition coordination rather than a formal office.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. The future Blockbuster could change safety and the final matchup, but its outcome was outside this boundary.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The current score shows which forms of influence produced responses for Barrett at this cutoff. Reward Power and Referent and Informational Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the limits keep temporary structure and incomplete promises from being overstated.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does Barrett’s reassurance to Taylor become a delivered vote?

Why It Matters: Delivery would confirm that his Reward Power reaches beyond a comforting promise.