Select Player · Episode 4Dee

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 4

Dee

Episode 4 Rank1of 17

Dee used HOH authority to name Ashley as the replacement nominee, disclosed Red Corner’s instrumental purpose to The Crossovers, issued selective assurances, and kept managing the vote. Repeated changes in other players’ planning raised Informational Power to 4. Rank 1 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 19.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Dee
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Dee

Power Rating By Episode

19Episode 4 Score
6121824E1E4
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Hidden Alliance and Vote Management Raise Dee’s Informational Power

Dee used HOH authority to name Ashley as the replacement nominee, disclosed Red Corner’s instrumental purpose to The Crossovers, issued selective assurances, and kept managing the vote. Repeated changes in other players’ planning raised Informational Power to 4.

Current Position: Rank 1 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 19.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 1 of 17 → Rank 1 of 17; Total Power Score 18 → 19.

Clearest Response: Dee accepted Mallory’s veto use and named Ashley as the replacement nominee.

What Changed: Informational Power 3 → 4.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Dee’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power4

The HOH office creates broad recognized authority for this cycle.

Reward Power2

A limited protection or benefit produces a response.

Coercive Power4

The HOH office supports immediate nomination consequences.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Dee’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power4

Information shapes major decisions across multiple groups.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Legitimate and Coercive PowerDee accepted Mallory’s veto use and named Ashley as the replacement nominee.The office continued to structure danger and force responses. It remained temporary and would expire after the eviction.
Informational PowerDee managed hidden alliances, selective disclosures, vote confusion, and changing target preferences.Several players changed plans around the information she controlled. Contradictory assurances created trust costs.
Referent and Reward PowerThe Crossovers stayed functional and Dee offered Yash reciprocal future protection.Voluntary cooperation and a limited benefit remained available, but Yash and others had reasons to doubt her promises.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Dee’s trust in Haley and Jason fell, while her Crossovers relationships remained functional. Her relationship with Yash included a new reciprocal deal after earlier damage.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

The Crossovers was active and functional. Red Corner and Cafe Con Leche remained confirmed but deceptive or uneven.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 4

Dee’s Total Power Score Rises by 1 Because Selective Disclosures and Vote Management Repeatedly Change Planning

Total Power Score: 18 → 19

Why: Dee used HOH authority to name Ashley as the replacement nominee, disclosed Red Corner’s instrumental purpose to The Crossovers, issued selective assurances, and kept managing the vote. Repeated changes in other players’ planning raised Informational Power to 4.

What Changed: Informational Power 3 → 4.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 4, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 4, Expert Power 2, and Referent Power 3.

Why It Matters: Dee could shape both the formal nominee set and the information environment around it. Her greatest risk was that too many contradictory assurances could convert short-term control into longer-term distrust.

05

Position Analysis

Hidden Alliance and Vote Management Raise Dee’s Informational Power

Dee could shape both the formal nominee set and the information environment around it. Her greatest risk was that too many contradictory assurances could convert short-term control into longer-term distrust.

Bottom Line: Dee led through current office, credible consequences, limited benefits, relationships, and broad information control (Legitimate 4, Coercive 4, Reward 2, Referent 3, Informational 4). Expert Power remained 2. The next test is whether the house follows her preferred vote without exposing her hidden structures.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Dee remained safe HOH with her nomination authority exercised. The Blockbuster and eviction had not occurred.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. The future Blockbuster could change safety and the final matchup, but its outcome was outside this boundary.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Reduce contradictory assurances, preserve hidden coalitions, and let voters own the final choice unless a tie occurs.

What Would Show It Worked: The vote settles without Dee spending more trust or revealing The Crossovers and Red Corner overlap.

08

What the Rating Means

The current score shows which forms of influence produced responses for Dee at this cutoff. Legitimate and Coercive Power and Informational Power and Referent and Reward Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the limits keep temporary structure and incomplete promises from being overstated.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does Dee still control the vote after the Blockbuster changes the final matchup?

Why It Matters: The response will show how much of her influence comes from information and relationships rather than the HOH office alone.