Select Player · Episode 4Rome

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 4

Rome

Episode 4 Rank9of 17

Rome’s attempt to push Haley as the replacement nominee failed, but his connections with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and others remained. Reward Power returned to 1 while Referent Power held at 3. Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Rome
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Rome

Power Rating By Episode

10Episode 4 Score
6121824E1E4
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Rome’s Relationships Hold as an Earlier Benefit Expires

Rome’s attempt to push Haley as the replacement nominee failed, but his connections with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and others remained. Reward Power returned to 1 while Referent Power held at 3.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rank and Score Movement: tied for Rank 3 of 17 → Tied for Rank 9 of 17; Total Power Score 11 → 10.

Clearest Response: Rome remained close to Lyric, worked with Chuk, and participated in Four Seasons and the voting bloc.

What Changed: Reward Power 2 → 1.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Rome’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No current valued benefit changes another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence changes another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Rome’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information access exists without repeated decision-changing use.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerRome remained close to Lyric, worked with Chuk, and participated in Four Seasons and the voting bloc.The network stayed broad. His failed Haley push showed that closeness did not guarantee decision control.
Reward PowerThe prior limited assistance resource was not sustained at the same level.No current benefit changed another player’s response, so Reward Power returned to 1.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Rome’s strongest ties with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and LaTrice remained visible.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

Rome joined Four Seasons and the temporary anti-Ashley/keep-Taylor voting bloc. Four Seasons was an untested surface alliance.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 4

Rome’s Total Power Score Falls by 1 Because an Earlier Assistance Benefit Expires while His Relationships Remain

Total Power Score: 11 → 10

Why: Rome’s attempt to push Haley as the replacement nominee failed, but his connections with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and others remained. Reward Power returned to 1 while Referent Power held at 3.

What Changed: Reward Power 2 → 1.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: Rome had many relationships but could not persuade Dee to use Haley as the replacement. The episode showed the difference between being connected and controlling a formal decision.

05

Position Analysis

Rome’s Relationships Hold as an Earlier Benefit Expires

Rome had many relationships but could not persuade Dee to use Haley as the replacement. The episode showed the difference between being connected and controlling a formal decision.

Bottom Line: Rome retained broad relationship power (Referent 3), but no current benefit supported Reward Power above 1. The next test is whether his network coordinates in the live vote.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Rome retained a premiere Safety Lock and was a safe voter.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. The future Blockbuster could change safety and the final matchup, but its outcome was outside this boundary.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The current score shows which forms of influence produced responses for Rome at this cutoff. Referent Power and Reward Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the limits keep temporary structure and incomplete promises from being overstated.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Who follows Rome in the live vote after his replacement pitch failed?

Why It Matters: The answer would show whether his relationships carry more weight in a vote than they did with Dee’s nomination decision.