Select Player · Episode 4Rome⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 4
Rome
Rome’s attempt to push Haley as the replacement nominee failed, but his connections with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and others remained. Reward Power returned to 1 while Referent Power held at 3. Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rome
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Rome’s Relationships Hold as an Earlier Benefit Expires
Rome’s attempt to push Haley as the replacement nominee failed, but his connections with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and others remained. Reward Power returned to 1 while Referent Power held at 3.
Current Position: Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.
Rank and Score Movement: tied for Rank 3 of 17 → Tied for Rank 9 of 17; Total Power Score 11 → 10.
Clearest Response: Rome remained close to Lyric, worked with Chuk, and participated in Four Seasons and the voting bloc.
What Changed: Reward Power 2 → 1.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Rome’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Referent Power | Rome remained close to Lyric, worked with Chuk, and participated in Four Seasons and the voting bloc. | The network stayed broad. His failed Haley push showed that closeness did not guarantee decision control. |
| Reward Power | The prior limited assistance resource was not sustained at the same level. | No current benefit changed another player’s response, so Reward Power returned to 1. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationships
Rome’s strongest ties with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and LaTrice remained visible.
Most Significant Alliances and Groups
Rome joined Four Seasons and the temporary anti-Ashley/keep-Taylor voting bloc. Four Seasons was an untested surface alliance.
04
Power Shifts
Episode 4
Rome’s Total Power Score Falls by 1 Because an Earlier Assistance Benefit Expires while His Relationships Remain
Total Power Score: 11 → 10
Why: Rome’s attempt to push Haley as the replacement nominee failed, but his connections with Lyric, Chuk, Jason, and others remained. Reward Power returned to 1 while Referent Power held at 3.
What Changed: Reward Power 2 → 1.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.
Why It Matters: Rome had many relationships but could not persuade Dee to use Haley as the replacement. The episode showed the difference between being connected and controlling a formal decision.
05
Position Analysis
Rome’s Relationships Hold as an Earlier Benefit Expires
Rome had many relationships but could not persuade Dee to use Haley as the replacement. The episode showed the difference between being connected and controlling a formal decision.
Bottom Line: Rome retained broad relationship power (Referent 3), but no current benefit supported Reward Power above 1. The next test is whether his network coordinates in the live vote.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Rome retained a premiere Safety Lock and was a safe voter.
Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. The future Blockbuster could change safety and the final matchup, but its outcome was outside this boundary.
07
Best Move Right Now
There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.
08
What the Rating Means
The current score shows which forms of influence produced responses for Rome at this cutoff. Referent Power and Reward Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the limits keep temporary structure and incomplete promises from being overstated.
09
Public Opinion
No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.
Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.
10
What to Watch For Next
Who follows Rome in the live vote after his replacement pitch failed?
Why It Matters: The answer would show whether his relationships carry more weight in a vote than they did with Dee’s nomination decision.
