Select Player · Episode 4LaTrice

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 4

LaTrice

Episode 4 Rank9of 17

LaTrice remained a close strategic partner to Taylor and was named by Lyric as part of a desired endgame group. Those ties kept Referent Power at 3 without a new score change. Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of LaTrice
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

LaTrice

Power Rating By Episode

10Episode 4 Score
6121824E1E4
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

LaTrice’s Taylor and Lyric Ties Keep Her Referent Power Steady

LaTrice remained a close strategic partner to Taylor and was named by Lyric as part of a desired endgame group. Those ties kept Referent Power at 3 without a new score change.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 9 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rank and Score Movement: tied for Rank 9 of 17 → Tied for Rank 9 of 17; Total Power Score 10 → 10.

Clearest Response: Taylor continued coordinating with LaTrice, and Lyric said she wanted LaTrice and Taylor with her at the end.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed; Total Power Score remained 10.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting LaTrice’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No current valued benefit changes another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence changes another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed LaTrice’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information access exists without repeated decision-changing use.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerTaylor continued coordinating with LaTrice, and Lyric said she wanted LaTrice and Taylor with her at the end.The relationships showed durable intent and planning. Final vote delivery remained untested.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

LaTrice ↔ Taylor remained strong, and Lyric → LaTrice strengthened through stated endgame commitment.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

LaTrice joined the temporary anti-Ashley/keep-Taylor voting bloc. It was not a durable named alliance.

04

Power Shifts

LaTrice’s Total Power Score Holds at 10 Because Her Closest Relationships Continue to Coordinate without Changing a Rating

Total Power Score: 10 → 10

Why: LaTrice remained a close strategic partner to Taylor and was named by Lyric as part of a desired endgame group. Those ties kept Referent Power at 3 without a new score change.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed; Total Power Score remained 10.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: LaTrice had relationships that pointed toward Taylor’s protection. The key limit was whether the final matchup would allow those commitments to be delivered.

05

Position Analysis

LaTrice’s Taylor and Lyric Ties Keep Her Referent Power Steady

LaTrice had relationships that pointed toward Taylor’s protection. The key limit was whether the final matchup would allow those commitments to be delivered.

Bottom Line: LaTrice retained meaningful voluntary coordination (Referent 3). The next test is whether she votes and campaigns in line with the protection she has offered Taylor.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

LaTrice was a safe voter with no current office or Safety Lock.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. The future Blockbuster could change safety and the final matchup, but its outcome was outside this boundary.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The current score shows which forms of influence produced responses for LaTrice at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the limits keep temporary structure and incomplete promises from being overstated.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does LaTrice deliver protection for Taylor after the Blockbuster?

Why It Matters: The vote would show whether strategic closeness becomes concrete protection.