Select Player · Episode 9LaTrice

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 9

LaTrice

Episode 9 Rank14of 15

LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. LaTrice held Rank 14 of 15 and a Total Power Score of 10.

Analysis by James BurnhamPower Model & Methodology

LaTrice

Power Rating By Episode

10Episode 9 Score

How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

Evidence Cutoff: July 24, 2026 · approximately 6:00 PM BBT
Evidence Boundary: Big Brother 28 through Episode 9 only; no veto selection, veto result, or later evidence

Player at a Glance

LaTrice’s Position After Episode 9

One event best captured LaTrice’s position at the cutoff: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.

After Rome’s eviction, fifteen players entered Week 3. Kamu won HOH, developed a plan to backdoor Jason, and nominated Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice as pawns. Jason recognized that he might be the real target, but he had not yet gained veto access at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 14 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 14 → Rank 14; Total Power Score 10 → 10.

Clearest Response: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting LaTrice’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power1

No offer or protection promise clearly changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information changes a response in a limited setting.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

Power	Evidence and Response	Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent Power	LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.	That response supports the rating. The episode did not show the same influence reaching beyond the people named here.
Relationships and Information	LaTrice ↔ Kamu was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.	The relationship mattered because it changed a real choice. The alliance name alone did not prove wider influence.

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

LaTrice ↔ Kamu · Relationship to Watch

Episode 9 put LaTrice’s connection with Kamu under direct pressure. The practical evidence came from a response, not the relationship label: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. This evidence stops with LaTrice, Kamu, and this decision.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Honor Society · Confirmed and emerging

For LaTrice in Episode 9, the group repeatedly coordinated, but had not yet demonstrated long-term durability.

Power Shifts

LaTrice’s Total Power Score Holds at 10

Total Power Score: 10 → 10

Why: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: Danger or opportunity can change without changing power. For LaTrice, the score stayed at 10.

Position Analysis

Where LaTrice Stands After Episode 9

LaTrice’s position rested most heavily on Referent Power. The episode record shows those strengths at work: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.

Bottom Line: LaTrice could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). That gives LaTrice a usable position without guaranteeing the same response elsewhere. Kamu now has the clearest chance to turn that relationship into protection or another game response.

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Kamu’s HOH win gave her safety, nomination authority, and credible replacement consequences. Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice became nominated pawns, while Jason faced concealed pressure. The Time Capsule twist gave Devens a Diamond Veto, but he had not used it. Veto access and chance remained future evidence.

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Kamu for one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: Kamu follows through by changing a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

What the Rating Means

The clearest influence in LaTrice’s Episode 9 score came from Referent Power. LaTrice demonstrated it through relationships that produced trust or protection.

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll Week	Fan Rank	Vote Share	RPM Rank at This Cutoff
1	8 of 17	4%	14 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.

What to Watch For Next

Does LaTrice’s most important relationship produce a concrete response?

Why It Matters: The answer matters because Kamu can turn the relationship into protection—or show where it stops.