Select Player · Episode 9LaTrice

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 9

LaTrice

Episode 9 Rank14of 15

LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. Rank 14 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of LaTrice
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

LaTrice

Power Rating By Episode

10Episode 9 Score
6121824E1E5E9
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

LaTrice Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes

LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. The episode also changed the house around LaTrice: After Rome’s eviction, fifteen players entered Week 3. Kamu won HOH, developed a plan to backdoor Jason, and nominated Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice as pawns. Jason recognized that he might be the real target, but he had not yet gained veto access at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 14 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 14 → Rank 14; Total Power Score 10 → 10.

Clearest Response: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting LaTrice’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right or accepted obligation is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No current benefit or protection promise is producing a demonstrated response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence is changing another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but repeated deference is not established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information changes a response in a limited setting.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerLaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationLaTrice ↔ Kamu was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

LaTrice ↔ Kamu · Current test

LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Honor Society · Confirmed and emerging

The group repeatedly coordinated, but had not yet demonstrated long-term durability.

04

Power Shifts

LaTrice’s Total Power Score Holds at 10 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead

Total Power Score: 10 → 10

Why: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around LaTrice, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.

05

Position Analysis

The Current Power Mix Defines the Position

LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to LaTrice alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.

Bottom Line: LaTrice could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. The next test is whether LaTrice ↔ Kamu produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Kamu’s HOH win gave her safety, nomination authority, and credible replacement consequences. Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice became nominated pawns, while Jason faced concealed pressure. Devens’s Diamond Veto was an unused production-created resource. Veto access and chance remained future evidence.

For LaTrice, the player-specific evidence is clear: LaTrice accepted Kamu’s pawn framing and remained nominated while keeping a broad relationship network. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Turn LaTrice ↔ Kamu into one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for LaTrice.

08

What the Rating Means

The score shows the kinds of influence LaTrice could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
18 of 174%14 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does LaTrice’s most important relationship produce a concrete response?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether LaTrice’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.