Select Player · Episode 9Mallory⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 9
Mallory
Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. Rank 6 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 12.
Mallory
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Mallory Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes
Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. The episode also changed the house around Mallory: After Rome’s eviction, fifteen players entered Week 3. Kamu won HOH, developed a plan to backdoor Jason, and nominated Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice as pawns. Jason recognized that he might be the real target, but he had not yet gained veto access at this cutoff.
Current Position: Rank 6 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 12.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 5 → Rank 6; Total Power Score 12 → 12.
Clearest Response: Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Mallory’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Referent Power | Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. | The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Mallory ← Her Protectors was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff. | The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Mallory ← Her Protectors · Current test
Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
Current Relationship Network · Active but limited
The player retained named relationship access, while the current episode did not establish a new broad alliance response.
04
Power Shifts
Mallory’s Total Power Score Holds at 12 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead
Total Power Score: 12 → 12
Why: Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist.
What Changed: No individual power rating changed.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 2, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.
Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Mallory, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.
05
Position Analysis
The Current Power Mix Defines the Position
Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Mallory alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.
Bottom Line: Mallory could still use several forms of influence (Legitimate 2, Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. The next test is whether Mallory ← Her Protectors produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Kamu’s HOH win gave her safety, nomination authority, and credible replacement consequences. Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice became nominated pawns, while Jason faced concealed pressure. Devens’s Diamond Veto was an unused production-created resource. Veto access and chance remained future evidence.
For Mallory, the player-specific evidence is clear: Mallory entered the block with several explicit protectors, showing that relationships and nomination structure could coexist. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Turn Mallory ← Her Protectors into one clear commitment before the next decision.
What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Mallory.
08
What the Rating Means
The score shows the kinds of influence Mallory could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.
09
Public Opinion
Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week
Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.
| Poll Week | Fan Rank | Vote Share | RPM Rank at This Cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 of 17 | 9% | 6 of 15 |
Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.
Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.
10
What to Watch For Next
Will someone in Mallory’s current group make the next choice that protects Mallory?
Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Mallory’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.