Select Player · Episode 9Haley⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 9
Haley
Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. Rank 14 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Haley
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Haley Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes
Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. The episode also changed the house around Haley: After Rome’s eviction, fifteen players entered Week 3. Kamu won HOH, developed a plan to backdoor Jason, and nominated Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice as pawns. Jason recognized that he might be the real target, but he had not yet gained veto access at this cutoff.
Current Position: Rank 14 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 10.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 14 → Rank 14; Total Power Score 10 → 10.
Clearest Response: Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Haley’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Referent Power | Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. | The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Haley → Honor Society was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff. | The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Haley → Honor Society · Current test
Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
Toolshed · Cycle-effective with mixed cohesion
The group executed the Rome cycle and continued shaping the Jason plan, while side deals and dissatisfaction limited durability.
04
Power Shifts
Haley’s Total Power Score Holds at 10 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead
Total Power Score: 10 → 10
Why: Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost.
What Changed: No individual power rating changed.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.
Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Haley, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.
05
Position Analysis
The Current Power Mix Defines the Position
Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Haley alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.
Bottom Line: Haley could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. The next test is whether Haley → Honor Society produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Kamu’s HOH win gave her safety, nomination authority, and credible replacement consequences. Lyric, Mallory, and LaTrice became nominated pawns, while Jason faced concealed pressure. Devens’s Diamond Veto was an unused production-created resource. Veto access and chance remained future evidence.
For Haley, the player-specific evidence is clear: Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Turn Haley → Honor Society into one clear commitment before the next decision.
What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Haley.
08
What the Rating Means
The score shows the kinds of influence Haley could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.
09
Public Opinion
Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week
Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.
| Poll Week | Fan Rank | Vote Share | RPM Rank at This Cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 of 17 | 1% | 14 of 15 |
Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.
Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.
A Question Worth Following
Are the house and fans noticing the same weaknesses? Haley ranks 14 in RPM and 15 in the Week 1 fan poll. Haley remained protected by Toolshed ties, but disclosing Honor Society information created a trust cost. Limited in-house response could help explain both positions, while the fan result may also reflect visibility or preference outside the game.
10
What to Watch For Next
How will Haley turn the named relationship into a concrete response?
Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Haley’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.
