Select Player · Episode 7Haley

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 7

Haley

Episode 7 Rank14of 16

Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. Rank 14 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Haley
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Haley

Power Rating By Episode

10Episode 7 Score
6121824E1E5E7
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–C for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Haley Turns Kamu and Chuk’s Protection Into Wider Relationship Power

Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. The episode also changed the house around Haley: Devens used the veto on Lyric and named Rome as the replacement nominee. Lyric became safe and told Devens that she owed him, while Jason, Melody, and Rome became the three players headed to the Blockbuster. The competition and eviction had not happened at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 14 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 10.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 15 → Rank 14; Total Power Score 9 → 10.

Clearest Response: Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Haley’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right or accepted obligation is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No current benefit or protection promise is producing a demonstrated response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence is changing another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but repeated deference is not established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information changes a response in a limited setting.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerRepeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power.The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationHaley ↔ Kamu and Chuk was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Haley ↔ Kamu and Chuk · Current test

Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Toolshed · Confirmed and coordinating

The group coordinated the Rome plan, while mixed personal commitment limited claims about long-term loyalty.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 7

Haley’s Total Power Score Rises by 1 Because Haley Turns Kamu and Chuk’s Protection Into Wider Relationship Power

Total Power Score: 9 → 10

Why: Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: The changed ratings identify which mechanism gained or lost demonstrated reach. The result still includes other players’ choices, structure, and chance.

05

Position Analysis

The Current Power Mix Defines the Position

Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Haley alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.

Bottom Line: Haley could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. The next test is whether Haley ↔ Kamu and Chuk produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Lyric’s Safety Lock came from Devens’s veto use. Jason, Melody, and Rome still had equal Blockbuster access, while Devens remained safe as HOH. Angela’s punishment and the still-open Round 2 audience vote remained separate from in-house power. The Blockbuster result and vote were outside this boundary.

For Haley, the player-specific evidence is clear: Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Turn Haley ↔ Kamu and Chuk into one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Haley.

08

What the Rating Means

The score shows the kinds of influence Haley could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
115 of 171%14 of 16

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Angela’s Round 1 Egg Detective punishment remained a separate production-designed audience action.

A Question Worth Following

Are the house and fans noticing the same weaknesses? Haley ranks 14 in RPM and 15 in the Week 1 fan poll. Repeated trust and protection from Kamu and Chuk, plus Toolshed membership, raised Haley’s Referent Power. Limited in-house response could help explain both positions, while the fan result may also reflect visibility or preference outside the game.

10

What to Watch For Next

Can Haley turn the named relationship into a vote, protection, or useful warning?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Haley’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.