Select Player · Episode 7Devens⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 7
Devens
Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. Rank 1 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 20.
Devens
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Devens Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes
Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. The episode also changed the house around Devens: Devens used the veto on Lyric and named Rome as the replacement nominee. Lyric became safe and told Devens that she owed him, while Jason, Melody, and Rome became the three players headed to the Blockbuster. The competition and eviction had not happened at this cutoff.
Current Position: Rank 1 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 20.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 1 → Rank 1; Total Power Score 20 → 20.
Clearest Response: Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Devens’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Informational Power | Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. | The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Devens ↔ Lyric was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff. | The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Devens ↔ Lyric · Current test
Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
The Dabbers · Confirmed surface alliance
The four-person group created access, while commitment and any expanded membership remained uncertain.
04
Power Shifts
Devens’s Total Power Score Holds at 20 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead
Total Power Score: 20 → 20
Why: Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee.
What Changed: No individual power rating changed.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 4, Reward Power 3, Coercive Power 4, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 4.
Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Devens, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.
05
Position Analysis
The Current Power Mix Defines the Position
Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Legitimate Power and Coercive Power and Informational Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Devens alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.
Bottom Line: Devens could still use several forms of influence (Legitimate 4, Reward 3, Coercive 4, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 4). Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. The next test is whether Devens ↔ Lyric produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Lyric’s Safety Lock came from Devens’s veto use. Jason, Melody, and Rome still had equal Blockbuster access, while Devens remained safe as HOH. Angela’s punishment and the still-open Round 2 audience vote remained separate from in-house power. The Blockbuster result and vote were outside this boundary.
For Devens, the player-specific evidence is clear: Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Turn Devens ↔ Lyric into one clear commitment before the next decision.
What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Devens.
08
What the Rating Means
The score shows the kinds of influence Devens could still use at this cutoff. Legitimate Power and Coercive Power and Informational Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.
09
Public Opinion
Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week
Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.
| Poll Week | Fan Rank | Vote Share | RPM Rank at This Cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 of 17 | 18% | 1 of 16 |
Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.
Official Audience Action: Angela’s Round 1 Egg Detective punishment remained a separate production-designed audience action.
A Question Worth Following
Is RPM seeing the same strong game that fans are responding to? Devens ranks 1 in RPM and 2 in the Week 1 fan poll. Devens used the veto on Lyric, received an explicit statement of obligation, and named Rome as the replacement nominee. Strong in-house responses could help explain the match, while visibility, personality, or the television edit could also shape fan support.
10
What to Watch For Next
What response will show that Devens’s strongest relationships still work?
Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Devens’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.