Select Player · Episode 3Mallory

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Mallory

Episode 3 Rank2of 17

Mallory won the veto while nominated, giving her narrow authority over its use and a guaranteed self-protection option. She also trusted Lyric and relied on Angela emotionally, raising Referent Power. Her Safety Lock had not activated because she had not yet used the veto. Tied for Rank 2 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 13.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Mallory
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Mallory

Power Rating By Episode

13Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

The Live Veto and Trusted Relationships Put Mallory in Second

Mallory won the veto while nominated, giving her narrow authority over its use and a guaranteed self-protection option. She also trusted Lyric and relied on Angela emotionally, raising Referent Power. Her Safety Lock had not activated because she had not yet used the veto.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 2 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 13.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 2 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 13.

Clearest Response: Mallory controlled the live veto and could use it on herself or another nominee.

What Changed: Legitimate Power 1 → 3; Reward Power 1 → 2; Referent Power 2 → 3.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Mallory’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power3

A narrow live game resource creates recognized decision authority.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection offer has produced a response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Mallory’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Ordinary information access exists without repeated decision-changing use.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Legitimate and Reward PowerMallory controlled the live veto and could use it on herself or another nominee.The resource gave her a recognized decision right and a valuable protection benefit. Both were narrow and would expire when the veto was used.
Referent PowerMallory trusted Lyric and described Angela as emotional protection.The relationships provided meaningful support. Her distrust of Melody showed that the network was not universal.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Mallory strengthened with Lyric and Angela while weakening with Melody.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

No confirmed named alliance at this cutoff fully represented Mallory’s strongest protection network.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 3

Mallory’s Total Power Score Rises by 4 Because the Live Veto Creates Narrow Authority and Her Trusted Relationships Provide Support

Total Power Score: 9 → 13

Why: Mallory won the veto while nominated, giving her narrow authority over its use and a guaranteed self-protection option. She also trusted Lyric and relied on Angela emotionally, raising Referent Power. Her Safety Lock had not activated because she had not yet used the veto.

What Changed: Legitimate Power 1 → 3; Reward Power 1 → 2; Referent Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: Mallory combined a temporary game resource with real personal support. The veto could guarantee safety; the relationships would matter after the resource expired.

05

Position Analysis

The Live Veto and Trusted Relationships Put Mallory in Second

Mallory combined a temporary game resource with real personal support. The veto could guarantee safety; the relationships would matter after the resource expired.

Bottom Line: Mallory’s temporary authority and protection resource (Legitimate 3, Reward 2) worked alongside trusted relationships (Referent 3). The next test is whether she uses the veto on herself and keeps those relationships intact.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Mallory was nominated but controlled a guaranteed way to save herself. The veto lowered her practical risk, yet her Safety Lock remained inactive until use.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Use the veto on herself rather than trade guaranteed safety for uncertain social leverage.

What Would Show It Worked: Mallory leaves the block and her trusted partners continue sharing information and protection after the veto expires.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Mallory could demonstrate at this cutoff. Legitimate and Reward Power and Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does Mallory use the veto on herself?

Why It Matters: Self-use converts a narrow decision right into certain safety; any other choice would require much stronger protection evidence.