Select Player · Episode 3Ashley

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Ashley

Episode 3 Rank16of 17

Ashley was the leading replacement-nominee possibility. She campaigned to Dee, received encouragement from Melody, Kamu, and Chuk, and had Kamu say he wanted her to stay. The support was real but had not yet produced firm protection or a higher score. Tied for Rank 16 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 9.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Ashley
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ashley

Power Rating By Episode

9Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. No Power Shift is recorded at this evidence boundary.

01

Player at a Glance

Support Exists, but Ashley Has Little Reliable Protection

Ashley was the leading replacement-nominee possibility. She campaigned to Dee, received encouragement from Melody, Kamu, and Chuk, and had Kamu say he wanted her to stay. The support was real but had not yet produced firm protection or a higher score.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 16 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 9.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 16 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 9.

Clearest Response: Kamu encouraged Ashley to keep fighting, while Melody coached her and Chuk explored recruitment.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed; Total Power Score remained 9.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Ashley’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No valued benefit has changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Ashley’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power2

Some ties exist, but broad or durable protection is not established.

Informational Power2

Ordinary information access exists without repeated decision-changing use.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerKamu encouraged Ashley to keep fighting, while Melody coached her and Chuk explored recruitment.Several people were willing to help. The support stopped short of a firm alliance or delivered protection, so Referent Power remained 2.
Informational PowerAshley made a case to Dee as replacement plans were discussed.She entered the decision conversation, but the episode did not show her changing Dee’s choice before the cutoff.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Ashley → Kamu strengthened when Kamu encouraged her and said he did not want her gone. Melody and Chuk also offered support, but no relationship had yet guaranteed safety.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

No named alliance included Ashley at this cutoff.

04

Power Shifts

Ashley’s Total Power Score Holds at 9 Because the Episode Does Not Change Any Rating

Total Power Score: 9 → 9

Why: Ashley was the leading replacement-nominee possibility. She campaigned to Dee, received encouragement from Melody, Kamu, and Chuk, and had Kamu say he wanted her to stay. The support was real but had not yet produced firm protection or a higher score.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed; Total Power Score remained 9.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 2, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: Ashley had people willing to encourage her, but she lacked a group that could reliably change the replacement decision. Her power attempts were still at the access and support stage rather than demonstrated control.

05

Position Analysis

Support Exists, but Ashley Has Little Reliable Protection

Ashley had people willing to encourage her, but she lacked a group that could reliably change the replacement decision. Her power attempts were still at the access and support stage rather than demonstrated control.

Bottom Line: Ashley had limited relationship and information pathways available (Referent 2, Informational 2), but neither had yet changed Dee’s decision. The next test is whether one supporter makes a concrete case that keeps her off the block.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Ashley faced high pressure as a leading replacement candidate. She had no Safety Lock, veto, or direct control over the ceremony.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Make a specific case against becoming the replacement nominee and give Dee a lower-cost alternative.

What Would Show It Worked: Dee removes Ashley from replacement consideration or a protector makes that change possible.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Ashley could demonstrate at this cutoff. Referent Power and Informational Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does anyone turn support for Ashley into action before the veto ceremony?

Why It Matters: A delivered intervention would separate friendly encouragement from usable Referent or Informational Power.