Select Player · Episode 3Taylor⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3
Taylor
Taylor disclosed target information, coordinated replacement ideas and vote counts with LaTrice and Dee, and reported no continuing hard feelings after the nomination. Those responses raised Referent and Informational Power while she remained nominated. Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.
Taylor
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Repaired Trust and Vote Coordination Raise Taylor’s Power
Taylor disclosed target information, coordinated replacement ideas and vote counts with LaTrice and Dee, and reported no continuing hard feelings after the nomination. Those responses raised Referent and Informational Power while she remained nominated.
Current Position: Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.
Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 3 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 11.
Clearest Response: Taylor transferred target information and counted votes with Dee and LaTrice.
What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Taylor’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Informational Power | Taylor transferred target information and counted votes with Dee and LaTrice. | Her information changed shared planning and coordination. It remained focused on the current nomination cycle. |
| Referent Power | Taylor repaired enough trust with Dee to coordinate and built repeated strategic commitment with LaTrice. | Those relationships produced active cooperation. They had not yet delivered final votes. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationships
Taylor ↔ LaTrice strengthened through repeated planning and commitment. Taylor’s relationship with Dee stabilized enough for vote counting after the nomination.
Most Significant Alliances and Groups
No named alliance at this cutoff fully represented Taylor’s strongest relationships.
04
Power Shifts
Episode 3
Taylor’s Total Power Score Rises by 2 Because Repaired Relationships and Target Information Change Shared Planning
Total Power Score: 9 → 11
Why: Taylor disclosed target information, coordinated replacement ideas and vote counts with LaTrice and Dee, and reported no continuing hard feelings after the nomination. Those responses raised Referent and Informational Power while she remained nominated.
What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, and Expert Power 2.
Why It Matters: Taylor turned early social damage and nomination pressure into active planning relationships. The remaining limit was delivery: coordinated conversations had not yet become enough votes or safety.
05
Position Analysis
Repaired Trust and Vote Coordination Raise Taylor’s Power
Taylor turned early social damage and nomination pressure into active planning relationships. The remaining limit was delivery: coordinated conversations had not yet become enough votes or safety.
Bottom Line: Taylor’s strongest tools were voluntary coordination and decision-shaping information (Referent 3, Informational 3). The next test is whether those relationships deliver explicit vote commitments.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Taylor remained nominated and under high pressure and did not control the veto. Her power ratings describe protection and coordination attempts, not safety.
Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Convert repaired trust into explicit vote commitments rather than relying only on the future Blockbuster.
What Would Show It Worked: Named voters commit to keeping Taylor and continue coordinating after the replacement nominee is set.
08
What the Rating Means
The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Taylor could demonstrate at this cutoff. Informational Power and Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.
09
Public Opinion
No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.
Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.
10
What to Watch For Next
Who gives Taylor an explicit vote commitment?
Why It Matters: Delivered commitments would show whether her relationships can protect her under real pressure.