Select Player · Episode 3Drew

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 3

Drew

Episode 3 Rank3of 17

Drew joined The Crossovers, maintained a strategic connection with Melody, and passed alliance information across groups. People included him in planning and shared candid concerns, raising Referent and Informational Power. Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Drew
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Drew

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 3 Score
6121824E1E3
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Cross-Network Brokerage Raises Drew’s Referent and Informational Power

Drew joined The Crossovers, maintained a strategic connection with Melody, and passed alliance information across groups. People included him in planning and shared candid concerns, raising Referent and Informational Power.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 3 of 17 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: No meaningful Episode 2 rank → Tied for Rank 3 of 17; Total Power Score 9 → 11.

Clearest Response: Drew brokered alliance information and gained access to Dee’s replacement planning.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Drew’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No valued benefit has changed another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No credible consequence has changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Drew’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Informational PowerDrew brokered alliance information and gained access to Dee’s replacement planning.His information helped players understand overlapping groups. The reach remained inside selected relationships and had not yet been tested by a vote.
Referent PowerMelody shared candid concern with Drew, and The Crossovers accepted him as an active member.Trust and inclusion gave him several working ties. Heavy information-sharing role could later make those ties question his loyalty.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Drew ↔ Melody strengthened through candid strategy and support. Drew also remained connected to Lyric from the opening episode.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

Drew was a high-commitment Crossovers member. The alliance was active but untested at eviction.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 3

Drew’s Total Power Score Rises by 2 Because Multiple Players Include Him in Strategy and Use His Information

Total Power Score: 9 → 11

Why: Drew joined The Crossovers, maintained a strategic connection with Melody, and passed alliance information across groups. People included him in planning and shared candid concerns, raising Referent and Informational Power.

What Changed: Referent Power 2 → 3; Informational Power 2 → 3.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, and Expert Power 2.

Why It Matters: Drew was becoming a bridge between people who did not share the same information. That made him useful, but the position would weaken if allies began comparing what he told each side.

05

Position Analysis

Cross-Network Brokerage Raises Drew’s Referent and Informational Power

Drew was becoming a bridge between people who did not share the same information. That made him useful, but the position would weaken if allies began comparing what he told each side.

Bottom Line: Drew’s influence came from trusted access and information-sharing role (Referent 3, Informational 3). The next test is whether his information changes a consequential vote or instead creates doubts about his loyalty.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Drew was safe from immediate nominee pressure but was a Have-Not. His power came from access and information-sharing role rather than a formal role.

Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active with no known recipient or result. Competition access, safety, pressure, and production-designed rules remained separate from the six ratings.

07

Best Move Right Now

There is not enough evidence yet to name a supported best move.

08

What the Rating Means

The Episode 3 score brings together the influence Drew could demonstrate at this cutoff. Informational Power and Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits show where those responses had not yet reached.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Round 1 Time Capsule voting remained active, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does Drew’s information-sharing role help settle the replacement plan?

Why It Matters: A changed decision would show that his information is shaping outcomes rather than only moving between conversations.