Select Player · Episode 10Drew⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 10
Drew
Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. Rank 6 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 12.
Drew
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Drew Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes
Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. The episode also changed the house around Drew: Jason correctly recognized the backdoor plan and asked for a path into the veto competition. LaTrice selected him through Houseguest Choice, giving him access. Lyric won the veto, so Jason remained exposed as Kamu’s intended replacement target.
Current Position: Rank 6 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 12.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 6 → Rank 6; Total Power Score 12 → 12.
Clearest Response: Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Drew’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Informational Power | Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. | The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Drew ↔ Kamu and Barrett was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff. | The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Drew ↔ Kamu and Barrett · Current test
Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
Handymen · Confirmed strong pair
Repeated strategic coordination gave the pair a useful private channel. Its next test is whether each protects the other when side deals are exposed.
04
Power Shifts
Drew’s Total Power Score Holds at 12 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead
Total Power Score: 12 → 12
Why: Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible.
What Changed: No individual power rating changed.
What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 4.
Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Drew, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.
05
Position Analysis
The Current Power Mix Defines the Position
Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Informational Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Drew alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.
Bottom Line: Drew could still use several forms of influence (Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 4). Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. The next test is whether Drew ↔ Kamu and Barrett produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
LaTrice’s Houseguest Choice gave Jason competition access, but Lyric won the veto. The win gave Lyric a recognized decision right, not automatic safety. Kamu remained safe as HOH with replacement authority. Devens’s Diamond Veto and the open Round 3 audience vote stayed separate from the six power ratings until a player response or use could be demonstrated.
For Drew, the player-specific evidence is clear: Drew’s Handymen, Jugglers, and Melody ties showed cross-group reach while Dee and Devens warned that his position was becoming visible. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Turn Drew ↔ Kamu and Barrett into one clear commitment before the next decision.
What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Drew.
08
What the Rating Means
The score shows the kinds of influence Drew could still use at this cutoff. Informational Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.
09
Public Opinion
Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week
Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.
| Poll Week | Fan Rank | Vote Share | RPM Rank at This Cutoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 of 17 | 6% | 6 of 15 |
Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.
Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.
10
What to Watch For Next
How will Drew turn the named relationship into a concrete response?
Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Drew’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.