Select Player · Episode 5Drew

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 5

Drew

Episode 5 Rank3of 16

Drew framed the unanimous vote as cover for The Crossovers, recognized that the save-Ashley coalition had collapsed, and privately warned Yash about the vote while gaining his secrecy. Those repeated responses raised Informational Power to 4. Tied for Rank 3 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Drew
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Drew

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 5 Score
6121824E1E5
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Alliance Cover and Private Calibration Raise Drew’s Informational Power

Drew framed the unanimous vote as cover for The Crossovers, recognized that the save-Ashley coalition had collapsed, and privately warned Yash about the vote while gaining his secrecy. Those repeated responses raised Informational Power to 4.

Current Position: Tied for Rank 3 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: tied for Rank 3 of 17 → Tied for Rank 3 of 16; Total Power Score 11 → 12.

Clearest Response: Drew interpreted the vote as alliance cover, quietly warned Yash, and gained Yash’s agreement to keep the warning secret.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Drew’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right is demonstrated.

Reward Power1

No current valued benefit changes another player’s response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence changes another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Other players had not repeatedly followed Drew’s advice or judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships produce trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power4

Information shapes major decisions across multiple groups.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Informational PowerDrew interpreted the vote as alliance cover, quietly warned Yash, and gained Yash’s agreement to keep the warning secret.His information changed understanding and coordination across several relationships. High visibility remained a trust risk.
Referent PowerYash trusted Drew’s warning, Melody remained a bridge, and The Crossovers continued to include him.The ties were useful but spread across groups with incompatible expectations.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationships

Drew → Yash strengthened through a private warning and accepted secrecy. Drew continued relying on Devens’s guidance and Melody’s channel.

Most Significant Alliances and Groups

The Crossovers demonstrated coordination. Court Jesters and Four Seasons remained compromised or strategically uneven.

04

Power Shifts

Episode 5

Drew’s Total Power Score Rises by 1 Because His Framing and Private Warning Change Multi-party Understanding

Total Power Score: 11 → 12

Why: Drew framed the unanimous vote as cover for The Crossovers, recognized that the save-Ashley coalition had collapsed, and privately warned Yash about the vote while gaining his secrecy. Those repeated responses raised Informational Power to 4.

What Changed: Informational Power 3 → 4.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 1, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Referent Power 3.

Why It Matters: Drew was one of the house’s most active interpreters and brokers. The value came from others using his framing or keeping his information confidential; the risk was that his many channels could expose him.

05

Position Analysis

Alliance Cover and Private Calibration Raise Drew’s Informational Power

Drew was one of the house’s most active interpreters and brokers. The value came from others using his framing or keeping his information confidential; the risk was that his many channels could expose him.

Bottom Line: Drew combined meaningful relationships with broad decision-shaping information (Referent 3, Informational 4). The next test is whether he can keep those channels after the new HOH makes his visibility more dangerous.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Drew voted in the unanimous eviction. The result supplied cover, while his information work—not the majority vote itself—raised the score.

The Week 1 cycle ended with no active HOH, nominees, or Safety Locks. Round 1 Time Capsule remained active with no known recipient or result.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Use information selectively, preserve alliance cover, and reduce avoidable attribution while keeping high-value bridges open.

What Would Show It Worked: Players continue sharing with Drew and do not unite around him as the source of conflicting information.

08

What the Rating Means

The current score shows the mix of influence Drew could still use after the first eviction cycle. Informational Power and Referent Power supplied the clearest evidence, while the stated limits identify what had not yet been delivered or tested.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result is available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: The Time Capsule twist had been announced, but no recipient or result was known. It is recorded separately from fan ranking.

10

What to Watch For Next

Who compares notes about Drew after the next HOH is known?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether his Informational Power remains an asset or turns into a Referent cost.