Select Player · Episode 10Chuk

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 10

Chuk

Episode 10 Rank10of 15

Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued. Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Chuk
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Chuk

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 10 Score
6121824E1E5E10
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Chuk Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes

Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued. The episode also changed the house around Chuk: Jason correctly recognized the backdoor plan and asked for a path into the veto competition. LaTrice selected him through Houseguest Choice, giving him access. Lyric won the veto, so Jason remained exposed as Kamu’s intended replacement target.

Current Position: Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 10 → Rank 10; Total Power Score 11 → 11.

Clearest Response: Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Chuk’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right or accepted obligation is demonstrated.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence is changing another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but repeated deference is not established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information changes a response in a limited setting.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerChuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued.The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationChuk ↔ Kamu and Haley was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley · Current test

Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Chuk–Kamu Duo · Confirmed and stable

The pair showed strong commitment. Its next test was whether the bond could survive competing alliance obligations.

04

Power Shifts

Chuk’s Total Power Score Holds at 11 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead

Total Power Score: 11 → 11

Why: Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Chuk, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.

05

Position Analysis

The Current Power Mix Defines the Position

Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Chuk alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.

Bottom Line: Chuk could still use several forms of influence (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued. The next test is whether Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

LaTrice’s Houseguest Choice gave Jason competition access, but Lyric won the veto. The win gave Lyric a recognized decision right, not automatic safety. Kamu remained safe as HOH with replacement authority. Devens’s Diamond Veto and the open Round 3 audience vote stayed separate from the six power ratings until a player response or use could be demonstrated.

For Chuk, the player-specific evidence is clear: Chuk remained protected through Kamu, Haley, and the Toolshed as the Jason plan continued. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Turn Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley into one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Chuk.

08

What the Rating Means

The score shows the kinds of influence Chuk could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
114 of 172%10 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Round 2 gave Devens a hidden Diamond Veto, which remained unused at this cutoff.

10

What to Watch For Next

Does Chuk’s most important relationship produce a concrete response?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Chuk’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.