Select Player · Episode 8Chuk

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 8

Chuk

Episode 8 Rank10of 15

Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley. Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Chuk
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Chuk

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 8 Score
6121824E1E5E8
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Chuk Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes

Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley. The episode also changed the house around Chuk: Jason, Melody, and Rome entered the Blockbuster in danger. Jason won and became safe, leaving Melody and Rome as the final nominees. Taylor voted to evict Melody. The other twelve voters evicted Rome, sending him out 12–1.

Current Position: Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 10 → Rank 10; Total Power Score 11 → 11.

Clearest Response: Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Chuk’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right or accepted obligation is demonstrated.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence is changing another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but repeated deference is not established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information changes a response in a limited setting.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerChuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley.The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationChuk ↔ Kamu and Haley was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley · Current test

Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Chuk–Kamu Duo · Confirmed and stable

The pair showed strong commitment. Its next test was whether the bond could survive competing alliance obligations.

04

Power Shifts

Chuk’s Total Power Score Holds at 11 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead

Total Power Score: 11 → 11

Why: Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Chuk, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.

05

Position Analysis

The Current Power Mix Defines the Position

Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Chuk alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.

Bottom Line: Chuk could still use several forms of influence (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley. The next test is whether Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Jason’s Blockbuster win gave temporary safety and changed the final matchup. Rome’s lack of veto access and Blockbuster loss narrowed his escape routes. The 12–1 vote still reflected individual choices rather than one automatic alliance response. All Week 2 formal authority and Safety Locks expired at the cycle boundary.

For Chuk, the player-specific evidence is clear: Chuk voted with the successful Rome plan and kept strong ties to Kamu and Haley. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Turn Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley into one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Chuk.

08

What the Rating Means

The score shows the kinds of influence Chuk could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
114 of 172%10 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Angela’s Round 1 Egg Detective punishment remained a separate production-designed audience action.

10

What to Watch For Next

Who will make the next concrete game choice that protects Chuk?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Chuk’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.