Select Player · Episode 8Chuk

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 8

Chuk

Episode 8 Rank10of 15

Chuk stayed with the plan and voted to evict Rome. His closest ties to Kamu and Haley remained intact after the vote. He ranked 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Chuk
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Chuk

Power Rating By Episode

11Episode 8 Score
6121824E1E5E8
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–A for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Chuk’s Position After Episode 8

Chuk followed the Toolshed plan when the vote arrived. Jason had already won Blockbuster safety, leaving Rome beside Melody on the block. Taylor voted against Melody; Chuk joined the other twelve voters in evicting Rome. His relationships with Kamu and Haley remained his clearest source of protection after the cycle closed.

Current Position: Rank 10 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 11.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 10 → Rank 10; Total Power Score 11 → 11.

Clearest Response: Chuk joined Kamu, Haley, and the wider majority in voting to evict Rome.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Chuk’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power2

Information changes a response in a limited setting.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerChuk stayed aligned with Kamu and Haley and voted for the plan they supported.The shared action showed continued coordination, but it did not prove that Chuk caused either ally’s vote.
Relationships and InformationKamu and Haley remained Chuk’s most important connections at this cutoff.Those ties kept him protected inside the majority. The episode did not show their influence extending beyond that group.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Chuk ↔ Kamu and Haley · Relationship to Watch

Kamu and Haley remained close to Chuk, and all three landed on the same side of the eviction. Their shared vote kept the relationship useful inside the majority. Because twelve people chose Rome, however, the result did not reveal how much protection the trio would provide in a divided house.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Chuk–Kamu Duo · Confirmed and stable

The pair showed strong commitment. For Chuk in Episode 8, the next test was whether the bond could survive competing alliance obligations.

04

Power Shifts

Chuk’s Total Power Score Holds at 11

Total Power Score: 11 → 11

Why: Chuk stayed aligned with Kamu and Haley and voted with the successful Rome plan, but no new response expanded his influence.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 2.

Why It Matters: The vote confirmed Chuk’s place in the majority without showing that he directed it. His score remained 11.

05

Position Analysis

Where Chuk Stands After Episode 8

Referent Power remained the strongest part of Chuk’s profile. His bonds with Kamu and Haley gave him a secure place inside the successful plan. A nearly unanimous vote could not show how those relationships would respond when protecting him carried a greater cost.

Bottom Line: Chuk could still use several forms of influence at once (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 2). His relationships kept him aligned and protected during the Rome vote, but the 12–1 result did not test how far that loyalty would stretch. The next HOH cycle could force Kamu or Haley to choose whether to protect him.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Jason’s Blockbuster win gave temporary safety and changed the final matchup. Rome’s lack of veto access and Blockbuster loss narrowed his escape routes. The 12–1 vote still reflected individual choices rather than one automatic alliance response. All Week 2 formal authority and Safety Locks expired at the cycle boundary.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Kamu and Haley for one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: Kamu or Haley follows through by changing a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

08

What the Rating Means

Chuk’s Episode 8 score leaned most heavily on Referent Power. His strongest evidence came from the continuing trust and coordination he shared with Kamu and Haley.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
114 of 172%10 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll. The current local dataset records the rank and share but does not record a published response count or repeat-voting rule. The poll measures participating fans, while RPM uses demonstrated responses inside the house. Fan support is not scored as Referent Power.

Official Audience Action: Angela’s Round 1 Egg Detective punishment remained a separate audience action created by the game.

10

What to Watch For Next

Will Kamu or Haley Protect Chuk When the House Splits?

Why It Matters: A difficult choice in Chuk’s favor would show that their loyalty means more than voting together in a 12–1 result.