Select Player · Episode 11Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 11

Barrett

Episode 11 Rank7of 15

Barrett kept working ties across groups. However, the tea party made his middle position easier to see. With a Total Power Score of 12, Barrett ranked 7 of 15.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 11 Score
6121824E1E5E10E11
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Barrett’s Position After Episode 11

Barrett’s clearest development came through one interaction: Barrett kept working ties across groups, but the tea party made his middle position easier to see.

Kamu gathered several players for a tea-party confrontation about Jason, Drew, and Barrett. The discussion exposed conflicting accounts and increased distrust, but it did not settle every claim. Lyric then rejected Jason’s pitch and used the veto on herself. Kamu named Jason as the replacement nominee.

Current Position: Rank 7 of 15 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 6 → Rank 7; Total Power Score 12 → 12.

Clearest Response: Barrett kept working ties across groups, but the tea party made his middle position easier to see.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly shapes planning or choices across several relationships.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerBarrett kept working ties across groups, but the tea party made his middle position easier to see.The named response supports the current rating. Its reach stops where another player chose differently or no additional response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationBarrett ↔ Drew was the most important relationship path at this cutoff.The bond mattered only to choices it actually changed; the relationship or alliance name did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Barrett ↔ Drew · Relationship to Watch

In Episode 11, Barrett could still look to Drew for trust, information, or protection. After Episode 11, the relationship earns more credit only if that support changes a real decision for Barrett.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Jugglers · Strong pair under pressure

For Barrett in Episode 11, the pair retained a direct bond while wider exposure made their other alliance positions less secure.

04

Power Shifts

Barrett’s Power Ratings Hold at 12 Through the Veto and Replacement Nomination

Total Power Score: 12 → 12

Why: Barrett kept working ties across groups, but the tea party made his middle position easier to see.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: Barrett’s role in the week became clearer without adding a new pattern of influence. The score held at 12.

05

Position Analysis

Where Barrett Stands After Episode 11

The strongest part of Barrett’s profile came from Referent Power and Informational Power. A concrete response supports that profile: Barrett kept working ties across groups, but the tea party made his middle position easier to see.

Bottom Line: Barrett still had these forms of influence available (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). Barrett produced a meaningful response, but its reach remained limited to the evidence above. A concrete choice from Drew would reveal how far the relationship can reach.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Lyric’s veto win and self-use created safety and opened the replacement slot. Kamu’s HOH office supplied the replacement right. The tea party was a player-created information event with mixed credibility. The Blockbuster, the final matchup, and the vote remained unresolved.

The Episode 11 competition and ceremony changed the choices around Barrett. That record did not show Barrett causing a repeated new response, so the Episode 11 score remained 12.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Drew for one clear promise before the next vote.

What Would Show It Worked: Someone named in the request follows through when the decision becomes real.

08

What the Rating Means

Barrett’s Episode 11 profile leaned most heavily on Referent Power and Informational Power. For Barrett in Episode 11, that meant the clearest influence came from relationships that produced trust or protection and information that changed plans or understanding.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
16 of 175%7 of 15
28 of 163%7 of 15

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll results recorded in the current local dataset. The poll reflects participating fans; RPM follows demonstrated influence inside the house.

A Question Worth Following

Are fans and RPM seeing the same strength in Barrett’s game after Episode 11? At the Episode 11 cutoff, Barrett is Rank 7 in RPM and Rank 8 in the latest available fan poll. Fans may be reacting to Barrett’s Episode 11 gameplay, personality, relationships, or screen time. For Barrett, the Episode 11 RPM comparison asks whether viewers are rewarding the same influence the house is responding to.

10

What to Watch For Next

What response will show that Barrett’s influence still reaches beyond one conversation?

Why It Matters: If someone follows through, Barrett has usable protection. If no one does, the relationship has reached its limit.