Select Player · Episode 21Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 21

Barrett

Episode 21 Rank4of 12

Drew’s replacement-risk warning changed Barrett’s urgency and veto planning. Barrett held Rank 4 of 12 and a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 21 Score
6121824E1E5E10E15E20E21
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Barrett’s Position After Episode 21

One event best captured Barrett’s position at the cutoff: Drew’s replacement-risk warning changed Barrett’s urgency and veto planning.

Episode 21 began with Angela, Dee, and Haley nominated by Yash. Barrett and Melody joined them in the OTEV field, and Yash won the Golden Power of Veto. Players then built competing plans around possible veto use, replacement nominees, and Devens’s still-hidden Diamond Veto.

Current Position: Rank 4 of 12 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 4 → Rank 4; Total Power Score 12 → 12.

Clearest Response: Drew’s replacement-risk warning changed Barrett’s urgency and veto planning.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly shapes planning or choices across several relationships.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerDrew’s replacement-risk warning changed Barrett’s urgency and veto planning.The named response supports the current rating. Its reach stops where another player chose differently or no additional response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationBarrett ↔ Drew was the most important relationship path at this cutoff.The bond mattered only to choices it actually changed; the relationship or alliance name did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Barrett ↔ Drew · Relationship to Watch

In Episode 21, Barrett could still look to Drew for trust, information, or protection. After Episode 21, the relationship earns more credit only if that support changes a real decision for Barrett.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Jugglers · Strong protective pair

Barrett and Drew shared replacement-risk information and coordinated around veto danger. Their bond mattered even as wider alliances split.

04

Power Shifts

Barrett’s Power Ratings Hold at 12 Through the Diamond Veto Ceremony

Total Power Score: 12 → 12

Why: Drew’s replacement-risk warning changed Barrett’s urgency and veto planning.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: Danger or opportunity can change without changing power. For Barrett in Episode 21, the score stayed at 12.

05

Position Analysis

Where Barrett Stands After Episode 21

Barrett’s position rested most heavily on Referent Power and Informational Power. The episode record shows those strengths at work: Drew’s replacement-risk warning changed Barrett’s urgency and veto planning.

Bottom Line: Barrett still had these forms of influence available (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). That gives Barrett a usable position without guaranteeing the same response elsewhere. The next test is whether that relationship protects Barrett through the Blockbuster and eviction.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Yash’s OTEV win created a temporary veto decision right, not Expert Power. Devens’s Diamond Veto created a separate temporary authority that expired when he used it. Dee received a Safety Lock after removal, while Angela, Haley, and Kamu retained direct Blockbuster access. The Week 5 poll was published after this cutoff and is excluded.

The Episode 21 competition and ceremony changed the choices around Barrett. That record did not show Barrett causing a repeated new response, so the Episode 21 score remained 12.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask Drew for one specific vote or warning before the Blockbuster.

What Would Show It Worked: Someone named in the request follows through when the decision becomes real.

08

What the Rating Means

The clearest influence in Barrett’s Episode 21 score came from Referent Power and Informational Power. Barrett demonstrated it through relationships that produced trust or protection and information that changed plans or understanding.

09

Public Opinion

Fan Rank and Vote Share by Week

Rank 1 is the highest fan position. Only completed results available before this page’s cutoff are shown.

Poll WeekFan RankVote ShareRPM Rank at This Cutoff
16 of 175%4 of 12
28 of 163%4 of 12
311 of 162%4 of 12
410 of 172%4 of 12

Source: Big Brother Network Favorite Houseguest poll results recorded in the current local dataset. The poll reflects participating fans; RPM follows demonstrated influence inside the house.

A Question Worth Following

Why do fans and RPM see Barrett so differently? At the Episode 21 cutoff, Barrett is Rank 4 in RPM and Rank 10 in the latest available fan poll. Fans may be reacting to Barrett’s Episode 21 gameplay, personality, relationships, or screen time. For Barrett, the Episode 21 RPM comparison asks whether viewers are rewarding the same influence the house is responding to.

10

What to Watch For Next

What response will show that Barrett’s influence still reaches beyond one conversation?

Why It Matters: If someone follows through, Barrett has usable protection. If no one does, the relationship has reached its limit.