Select Player · Episode 6Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6

Barrett

Episode 6 Rank4of 16

Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. Rank 4 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 6 Score
6121824E1E5E6
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Barrett Keeps the Same Ratings as the Next Test Changes

Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. The episode also changed the house around Barrett: After Ashley left, the house reset with sixteen players and no active HOH or Safety Locks. Devens won HOH, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and then won the veto. Rome was discussed as the replacement target, but the ceremony had not happened at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 4 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 3 → Rank 4; Total Power Score 12 → 12.

Clearest Response: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No current recognized decision right or accepted obligation is demonstrated.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No current credible consequence is changing another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but repeated deference is not established.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerBarrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated.
Relationships and InformationBarrett ↔ The Crossovers was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Barrett ↔ The Crossovers · Current test

Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Toolshed · Confirmed and coordinating

The group coordinated the Rome plan, while mixed personal commitment limited claims about long-term loyalty.

04

Power Shifts

Barrett’s Total Power Score Holds at 12 While the Episode Changes the Test Ahead

Total Power Score: 12 → 12

Why: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: The episode changed the situation around Barrett, but the evidence did not cross another full rating threshold.

05

Position Analysis

The Current Power Mix Defines the Position

Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Referent Power and Informational Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Barrett alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.

Bottom Line: Barrett could still use several forms of influence (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. The next test is whether Barrett ↔ The Crossovers produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and formal decision rights. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were production-designed conditions. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.

For Barrett, the player-specific evidence is clear: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Turn Barrett ↔ The Crossovers into one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Barrett.

08

What the Rating Means

The score shows the kinds of influence Barrett could still use at this cutoff. Referent Power and Informational Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.

10

What to Watch For Next

Can Barrett turn the named relationship into a vote, protection, or useful warning?

Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Barrett’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.