Select Player · Episode 6Barrett

Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6

Barrett

Episode 6 Rank4of 16

Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. The result left Barrett ranked 4 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Official Big Brother 28 cast portrait of Barrett
Photo: Evan Mulling ©2026 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Barrett

Power Rating By Episode

12Episode 6 Score
6121824E1E5E6
How to read this graph: The Power Rating is the sum of a player’s six individual power scores. Each power is scored from 1 to 4, so the highest possible Power Rating is 24. Hover over, focus, or select A–B for a short explanation.

01

Player at a Glance

Barrett’s Position After Episode 6

The immediate picture for Barrett centered on this: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.

After Ashley left, the house reset with sixteen players and no active HOH or Safety Locks. Devens won HOH, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and then won the veto. Rome was discussed as the replacement target, but the ceremony had not happened at this cutoff.

Current Position: Rank 4 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 12.

Rank and Score Movement: Rank 3 → Rank 4; Total Power Score 12 → 12.

Clearest Response: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.

02

Current Power

These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Barrett’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.

Current Ratings

Legitimate Power1

No official role, game rule, or accepted promise gave the player influence here.

Reward Power2

A limited benefit or protection promise produces a response.

Coercive Power1

No threat or possible consequence clearly changed another player’s response.

Expert Power2

Ability or judgment is visible, but other players have not repeatedly followed that judgment.

Referent Power3

Several voluntary relationships provide trust, protection, or coordination.

Informational Power3

Information repeatedly changes planning or coordination.

Clearest Supporting Evidence

PowerEvidence and ResponseWhy It Mattered and Where It Stopped
Referent PowerBarrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.That response supports the rating. The episode did not show the same influence reaching beyond the people named here.
Relationships and InformationBarrett ↔ The Crossovers was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff.The relationship mattered because it changed a real choice. The alliance name alone did not prove wider influence.

03

Relationships and Alliances

Most Significant Relationship

Barrett ↔ The Crossovers · Relationship to Watch

Barrett’s clearest relationship path ran through The Crossovers. Its value appeared in a specific choice: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan. The episode did not show Barrett’s bond with The Crossovers producing wider control.

Most Significant Alliance or Group

Toolshed · Confirmed and coordinating

For Barrett in Episode 6, the group coordinated the Rome plan, while mixed personal commitment limited claims about long-term loyalty.

04

Power Shifts

Barrett’s Total Power Score Holds at 12

Total Power Score: 12 → 12

Why: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.

What Changed: No individual power rating changed.

What Stayed the Same: Legitimate Power 1, Reward Power 2, Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, Referent Power 3, and Informational Power 3.

Why It Matters: No new response was repeated strongly enough to move a rating, so Barrett remained at 12.

05

Position Analysis

Where Barrett Stands After Episode 6

At this cutoff, Referent Power and Informational Power stood out most in Barrett’s score. The clearest example came through this exchange: Barrett entered the Toolshed and retained Crossovers protection and information access during the Rome plan.

Bottom Line: Barrett could still use several forms of influence (Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 3, and Informational 3). The influence was real at this cutoff, though the next choice could expose its limit. The relationship’s value depends on whether The Crossovers changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

06

Performance, Structure, and Chance

Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and official decision-making power. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were conditions created by the game. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.

07

Best Move Right Now

Best Move Right Now: Ask The Crossovers for one clear commitment before the next decision.

What Would Show It Worked: The Crossovers follows through by changing a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice.

08

What the Rating Means

Referent Power and Informational Power stood above the other parts of Barrett’s Episode 6 profile. In Barrett’s game, the practical evidence involved relationships that produced trust or protection and information that changed plans or understanding.

09

Public Opinion

No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.

Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.

10

What to Watch For Next

Can Barrett turn the named relationship into a vote, protection, or useful warning?

Why It Matters: What The Crossovers does next will reveal whether the relationship reaches beyond conversation.