Select Player · Episode 6Jason⌄
Active Player Big Brother 28 · Through Episode 6
Jason
Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. Rank 9 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 11.
Jason
Power Rating By Episode
01
Player at a Glance
Jason Repairs Part of His Relationship With Angela
Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. The episode also changed the house around Jason: After Ashley left, the house reset with sixteen players and no active HOH or Safety Locks. Devens won HOH, nominated Jason, Lyric, and Melody, and then won the veto. Rome was discussed as the replacement target, but the ceremony had not happened at this cutoff.
Current Position: Rank 9 of 16 with a Total Power Score of 11.
Rank and Score Movement: Rank 16 → Rank 9; Total Power Score 8 → 11.
Clearest Response: Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed.
02
Current Power
These are the clearest and most consequential examples supporting Jason’s six current power ratings—not every observed or attempted use of power.
Current Ratings
Clearest Supporting Evidence
| Power | Evidence and Response | Why It Mattered and Where It Stopped |
|---|---|---|
| Legitimate Power and Reward Power and Informational Power | Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. | The observed response or demonstrated consequence supports the current profile. Its reach stops where other players kept independent motives or no further response was demonstrated. |
| Relationships and Information | Jason ↔ Angela was the most relevant relationship path at this cutoff. | The connection mattered only to the choices it actually changed; an alliance name or favorable result did not add automatic credit. |
03
Relationships and Alliances
Most Significant Relationship
Jason ↔ Angela · Current test
Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. This relationship mattered because a named action or response affected the player’s options. Its reach remained limited to the people and decision described.
Most Significant Alliance or Group
Mama’s Angels · Confirmed but strained
The trio remained connected, while strain around Rome limited cohesion and broad protection.
04
Power Shifts
Episode 6
Jason’s Total Power Score Rises by 3 Because Jason Repairs Part of His Relationship With Angela
Total Power Score: 8 → 11
Why: Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed.
What Changed: Legitimate Power 1 → 2; Reward Power 1 → 2; Informational Power 1 → 2.
What Stayed the Same: Coercive Power 1, Expert Power 2, and Referent Power 2.
Why It Matters: The changed ratings identify which mechanism gained or lost demonstrated reach. The result still includes other players’ choices, structure, and chance.
05
Position Analysis
The Current Power Mix Defines the Position
Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. The current score places the player’s strongest evidence in Legitimate Power and Reward Power and Expert Power and Referent Power and Informational Power. That influence worked through the named response, while the present limit is that no episode result can be credited to Jason alone. Rank movement can also occur when other players’ scores change even if this score holds.
Bottom Line: Jason could still use several forms of influence (Legitimate 2, Reward 2, Expert 2, Referent 2, and Informational 2). Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. The next test is whether Jason ↔ Angela produces a concrete vote, protection, nomination, or information response.
06
Performance, Structure, and Chance
Devens won both HOH and veto, giving him safety and formal decision rights. Jason, Lyric, and Melody were nominated, while Rome lacked direct veto access because of the draw. Angela’s punishment and the open Round 2 audience vote were production-designed conditions. The ceremony and any eviction result remained future evidence.
For Jason, the player-specific evidence is clear: Jason disclosed useful information to Angela and offered a three-week safety deal that repaired part of the relationship, but his veto pitch to Devens failed. Competition access, safety, production rules, and chance are recorded separately from the six powers unless another player’s response or a demonstrated consequence supports a rating.
07
Best Move Right Now
Best Move Right Now: Turn Jason ↔ Angela into one clear commitment before the next decision.
What Would Show It Worked: The named player or group changes a vote, nomination, protection, or information choice for Jason.
08
What the Rating Means
The score shows the kinds of influence Jason could still use at this cutoff. Legitimate Power and Reward Power and Expert Power and Referent Power and Informational Power supplied the strongest part of the profile, while the next game decision would show whether that influence could reach beyond the relationships already observed.
09
Public Opinion
No completed public-opinion result was available at this Evidence Cutoff.
Official Audience Action: Angela had received the Egg Detective punishment from Round 1, while Round 2 voting remained open with no known recipient. Audience action is recorded separately from in-house power.
10
What to Watch For Next
Can Jason turn the named relationship into a vote, protection, or useful warning?
Why It Matters: The answer will show whether Jason’s current ratings produce a new observable response or remain limited to the evidence already recorded.