{ "status": "ACCEPTED_FOR_PUBLICATION", "request": "Execute the same for episode 2.", "protocol": "Workflow/RPM_Public_Language_Filter_v1.md", "date": "2026-10-12", "scope": "Full Episode 2 page and all 21 player cards; publication authorized October 12, 2026.", "editorial_models": [ { "id": "H05", "author": "Andy Dehnart", "outlet": "reality blurred", "url": "https://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/2026/09/survivor-51-episode-2-weaponized-honesty-recap/", "publication_date": "2026-09-30", "modified_date": "2026-10-03", "collection_date": "2026-10-12", "genre": "recap and criticism", "access": "Article body and comments read.", "authorship_basis": "Named byline and site declaration of human-crafted content; declaration, not independent production audit.", "excerpt": "But just like Big Brother, the pawn went home.", "reader_note": "Concrete choices, quick consequences, and a clear point of view. Its insults and motive guesses are not game evidence.", "comparison": "The opening and Ana card connect a decoy offer to the result without copying the writer’s phrasing. The Rob question retains reader confusion but answers with Eric’s recorded refusal; it avoids the writer’s ridicule and private-motive certainty." }, { "id": "H08", "author": "Cory Gage", "outlet": "Inside Survivor", "url": "https://insidesurvivor.com/survivor-51-episode-2-recap-one-and-a-half-thumbs-up-61776", "publication_date": "2026-10-01", "collection_date": "2026-10-12", "genre": "recap and criticism", "access": "Article body read through the target change and Tribal sequence.", "authorship_basis": "Named byline and author archive. No independent proof of human-only production.", "excerpt": "Ana really got the chaos she wanted", "reader_note": "Follow who tells whom and what happens next. Its exact vote map and motive assertions are not adopted.", "comparison": "Alexis, Linnea and Sharonda have different verbs and different supported responses. The Jelly card distinguishes finding from telling; it avoids importing the recap’s claim of a secure new majority." } ], "question_sources": [ { "question": "Did Ana talk herself out of the game?", "origin": "RPM adaptation of the attributed source text, checked against accepted game evidence.", "sources": [ { "author": "stonedboss", "text": "The weekly discussion blames Ana’s many mistakes for turning an easy Eric vote against her.", "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/survivor/comments/1wwa7hh/survivor_51_episodes_2_player_of_the_week_results/", "label": "Discussion paraphrase", "genre": "discussion", "kind": "PARAPHRASE", "publication_date": null, "collection_date": "2026-10-12", "date_limit": "Relative comment times shown; exact comment date not independently established.", "short_verbatim_excerpt": "Ana managed to swing an easy vote on Eric to herself", "access": "Visible source body/comment text inspected October 12.", "authorship_basis": "Public account handle; no independent proof of production method." } ], "record_ids": [ "PE-S51E02-A01-INF", "PE-S51E02-A05-INF", "PE-S51E02-A02-INF" ], "evidence_ids": [ "EVD-S51E02-002", "EVD-S51E02-003", "EVD-S51E02-015", "EVD-S51E02-016" ], "headline_fit": "She gave people reasons to turn on her. They still had to choose." }, { "question": "Did Alexis get enough credit?", "origin": "RPM adaptation of the attributed source text, checked against accepted game evidence.", "sources": [ { "author": "Lucasion", "text": "This commenter argues that Alexis’s push against Ana deserves more credit than the discussion gives it.", "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/survivor/comments/1wwa7hh/survivor_51_episodes_2_player_of_the_week_results/", "label": "Discussion paraphrase", "genre": "discussion", "kind": "PARAPHRASE", "publication_date": null, "collection_date": "2026-10-12", "date_limit": "Relative comment times shown; exact comment date not independently established.", "short_verbatim_excerpt": "Alexis is the one who wanted Ana out instead of Eric", "access": "Visible source body/comment text inspected October 12.", "authorship_basis": "Public account handle; no independent proof of production method." } ], "record_ids": [ "PE-S51E02-A02-INF", "PE-S51E02-A06-INF", "PE-S51E02-A07-INF" ], "evidence_ids": [ "EVD-S51E02-003", "EVD-S51E02-016" ], "headline_fit": "Alexis started a warning chain. Sharonda got a stated switch." }, { "question": "What did Jelly gain by telling Patt?", "origin": "RPM adaptation of the attributed source text, checked against accepted game evidence.", "sources": [ { "author": "stonedboss", "text": "The weekly discussion praises Jelly’s idol find and the stronger connection with Patt.", "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/survivor/comments/1wwa7hh/survivor_51_episodes_2_player_of_the_week_results/", "label": "Discussion paraphrase", "genre": "discussion", "kind": "PARAPHRASE", "publication_date": null, "collection_date": "2026-10-12", "date_limit": "Relative comment times shown; exact comment date not independently established.", "short_verbatim_excerpt": "Jelly found an idol while also strengthening her alliances", "access": "Visible source body/comment text inspected October 12.", "authorship_basis": "Public account handle; no independent proof of production method." } ], "record_ids": [ "PE-S51E02-A04-INF" ], "evidence_ids": [ "EVD-S51E02-010", "EVD-S51E02-011", "EVD-S51E02-012" ], "headline_fit": "She got trust and a planning partner." }, { "question": "Why would Eric trust a secret plan?", "origin": "RPM adaptation of the attributed source text, checked against accepted game evidence.", "sources": [ { "author": "Jason", "text": "This reader was confused by Rob’s plan and wondered whether he really intended to leave.", "url": "https://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/2026/09/survivor-51-episode-2-weaponized-honesty-recap/", "label": "Reader-comment paraphrase", "genre": "reader comment", "kind": "PARAPHRASE", "publication_date": "2026-10-01", "collection_date": "2026-10-12", "date_limit": null, "short_verbatim_excerpt": "I was REALLY confused as to what Rob’s plan was.", "access": "Visible source body/comment text inspected October 12.", "authorship_basis": "Public account handle; no independent proof of production method." } ], "record_ids": [], "evidence_ids": [ "EVD-S51E02-017", "EVD-S51E02-018", "EVD-S51E02-019", "EVD-S51E02-020", "EVD-S51E02-030" ], "headline_fit": "Eric wanted details before he would agree." } ], "editorial_observations": [ { "scope": "Opening and Ana story", "observation": "Named choices come before the explanation: Eric is the early target, Ana offers a decoy, the warning travels and Ana leaves. The question remains proportionate to several contributions.", "model": "H05", "revision": "Avoided “distributed target formation” and private-motive certainty." }, { "scope": "Alexis, Linnea, Sharonda and Ori cards; credit discussion", "observation": "The cards distinguish warning, relay, pitch and stated response. They do not repeat a generic “information effect” sentence or assign Ori’s ballot.", "model": "H08", "revision": "Replaced research-process labels with the particular thing each person said or did." }, { "scope": "Jelly, Patt and Rob cards; explanations below bars", "observation": "Finding the idol, disclosing it and receiving the disclosure are kept separate. Eric’s resistance cannot inflate Rob’s worked-use graph.", "model": "H05 and H08", "revision": "Explicitly labeled the count’s original-wave scope and the excluded trust request." }, { "scope": "Remaining cast and history captions", "observation": "Participation, proposed group membership, prior shared uses and missing individual findings receive different explanations. Aaliyah’s E2 point says already out. No low-strength verdict is inferred.", "model": "Concrete action and consequence approach in H08", "revision": "Replaced repeated “not supported” six-base state prose with brief, specific card stories." }, { "scope": "October 3 update and Ana/Carter card additions", "observation": "The later scene changes the current relationship account without changing the six original uses. Access and chronology limits remain beside that claim.", "model": "H05 for consequence-first wording; game findings from accepted later workbook", "revision": "Removed “Ana mistook trust for wider influence” because that wording could overstate her private belief." } ], "limits": [ "Non-independent Codex editorial check; James judges the voice.", "No audience survey or popularity claim; exact Reddit comment dates unavailable in retrieved view.", "Named byline and publisher declarations are not independent proof of human-only production.", "Six original findings and two separately dated relationship effects preserved; no new game analysis or tally repair." ], "provenance": { "outputs/survivor-s51e02-phase2-v01/RPM_Survivor_S51E02_Phase2_Qualitative_Analysis_Candidate_v0_1.xlsx": "1e8d5ee732e1abbb07ddf5fef36aaf28111bc5c60bc8c31f1a7f584fb2961431", "outputs/survivor-s51e02-retrospective-wave-v02/RPM_Survivor_S51E02_Retrospective_Analysis_Candidate_v0_2.xlsx": "190052252c6acb46dc63881fd3c950a25a7bca38769c46c2ec8dd39186426858", "outputs/survivor-s51e01-phase2-v02/RPM_Survivor_S51E01_Phase2_Qualitative_Analysis_Candidate_v0_2.xlsx": "7a4e9194c2554a9965f14129e0465dbd06b78b57578cd2558e2728953e15d978" }, "phase3_review_status": "LOCAL_REVIEW_CANDIDATE_JAMES_PENDING", "publication_authorization": { "by": "James Burnham", "instruction": "Push episodes 1 and 2 live", "date": "2026-10-12", "scope": "Reviewed full Episode 1 and 2 pages, all 42 player cards and bound downloads." } }